Cited by 116Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Generalizability of Associations from Prostate Cancer Genome-Wide Association Studies in Multiple Populations

Open access
Waters, Kevin M., Le Marchand, Loic, Kolonel, Laurence N., Monroe, Kristine R., Stram, Daniel O., Henderson, Brian E., Haiman, Christopher A.·2009·Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies have identified multiple common alleles associated with prostate cancer risk in populations of European ancestry. Testing these variants in other populations is needed to assess the generalizability of the associations and may guide fine-mapping efforts. We examined 13 of these risk variants in a multiethnic sample of 2,768 incident prostate cancer cases and 2,359 controls from the Multiethnic Cohort (African Americans, European Americans, Latinos, Japanese Americans, and Native Hawaiians). We estimated ethnic-specific and pooled odds ratios and tested for ethnic heterogeneity of effects using logistic regression. In ethnic-pooled analyses, 12 of the 13 variants were positively associated with risk, with statistically significant associations (P < 0.05) noted with six variants: JAZF1, rs10486567 [odds ratio (OR), 1.23; 95% confidence interval (95% CI, 1.12-1.35); Xp11.2, rs5945572 (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13-1.51); HNF1B, rs4430796 (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25); MSMB, rs10993994 (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.23); 11q13.2, rs7931342 (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.23); 3p12.1, rs2660753 (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21); SLC22A3, rs9364554 (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.21); CTBP2, rs12769019 (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.99-1.25); HNF1B, rs11649743 (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.99-1.22); EHBP1, rs721048 (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94-1.25); KLK2/3, rs2735839 (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.97-1.16); 17q24.3, rs1859962 (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.96-1.13); and LMTK2, rs6465657 (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.89-1.09). Significant ethnic heterogeneity of effects was noted for four variants (EHBP1, Phet = 3.9 × 10−3; 11q13, Phet = 0.023; HNF1B (rs4430796), Phet = 0.026; and KLK2/3, Phet = 2.0 × 10−3). Although power was limited in some ethnic/racial groups due to variation in sample size and allele frequencies, these findings suggest that a large fraction of prostate cancer variants identified in populations of European ancestry are global markers of risk. For many of these regions, fine-mapping in non-European samples may help localize causal alleles and better determine their contribution to prostate cancer risk in the population. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(4):1285–9)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-1142

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Under mutation-selection balance, different novel rare variants may have effects in each population, and fine mapping sometimes reveals subtle differences in association patterns.

    “Under a mutation-selection balance model, it may be possible for different novel rare variants to have effects in each population, and fine mapping studies sometimes reveal subtle differences in the patterns of association [eg.67,68.”

    From Rare and common variants: twenty arguments (2012) · cites this paper as [68]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 116

Metadata

Authors
Waters, K. M., Le Marchand, L., Kolonel, L. N., Monroe, K. R., Stram, D. O., Henderson, B. E., & Haiman, C. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • 2Epidemiology Program, Cancer Research Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2009-04-01
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
1285-1289
ISSN
  • 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7755
OpenAlex
W2043913929
Cited by
116
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (U01HG004802)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA63464, U01CA063464, R37CA054281, R01CA054281, R01CA063464, CA 54281)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
prostate cancer, genetic risk variants, multi-ethnic cohort, JAZF1, HNF1B, MSMB, SLC22A3, CtBP2, EHBP1
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Asian, Black or African American, Ethnicity, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatic Neoplasms, Cohort Studies, Case-Control Studies, White People, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review