Cited by 58Sleep and Work-Related FatigueCircadian rhythm and melatoninCancer Risks and Factors

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Rotating Night Shift Work and Risk of Ovarian Cancer

Open access
Poole, Elizabeth M., Schernhammer, Eva S., Tworoger, Shelley S.·2011·Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Abstract

Background: Night shift work has been associated with higher risks of breast and endometrial cancer, but few studies have evaluated associations with other reproductive cancers. Methods: We examined the association between rotating night shift work and risk of ovarian cancer during 20 years of follow-up in 181,548 women participating in two large cohort studies, the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and NHSII. Number of years of rotating night shift work was queried in 1988 for NHS and in 1989, 1991, 1993, 2001, and 2005 for NHSII. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to model HRs and 95% CIs of ovarian cancer for each shift work category (1–2, 3–5, 6–9, 10–14, 15–19, and 20+ years). Results: We confirmed 718 incident cases of ovarian cancer over 2,974,672 person-years of follow-up. Rotating shift work was not associated with ovarian cancer risk in either cohort individually. Combining both cohorts, compared with women without any night work, the HR for 15 to 19 years of rotating night shift work was 1.28 (95% CI: 0.84–1.94) and for 20+ years 0.80 (95% CI: 0.51–1.23). Conclusions: In this large prospective study, there was no association between duration of rotating night shift work and risk of ovarian cancer. Impact: Although associated with other cancers, night shift work does not appear to be associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer. However, further exploration of the association between melatonin and risk of ovarian cancer is warranted. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 20(5); 934–8. ©2011 AACR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-0138

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decrease of melatonin levels plays an important role in development of chronic diseases and conditions such as cancer, cardiovascular diseases, reproduction, endometriosis, gastrointestinal and digestive problems, diabetes, obesity, depression, sleep deprivation, bipolar spectrum disorders, and cognitive impairment.

    “For instance, decrease of melatonin levels plays an important role in development of chronic diseases and conditions such as cancer 61, 80, 81, 82, 83, cardiovascular diseases 83, reproduction 84, endometriosis 84, gastrointestinal and digestive problems 85, diabetes 86, 87, obesity 88, depression 89, sleep deprivation 90, bipolar spectrum disorders 91, and cognitive impairment 92.”

    From The inner clock-Blue light sets the human rhythm (2019) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Introduction says diminished melatonin production may link night-shift work to cancer risk and describes possible anti-cancer effects of melatonin. That supports the cancer portion of the citing sentence, but not its stronger assertion that decreased melatonin plays an established, important role in cancer development. The Discussion reports no association between rotating night shifts and ovarian cancer in this study; the other listed conditions are cited to other sources. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 58

Metadata

Authors
Poole, E. M., Schernhammer, E. S., & Tworoger, S. S.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Poole, Elizabeth M.
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2011-05-01
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
934-938
ISSN
  • 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7755
OpenAlex
W2154152340
Cited by
58
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P01CA087969, R01CA050385, [P01 CA87969, T32CA009001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
Keywords
rotating night shift work, ovarian cancer, occupational cancer risk, Nurses' Health Study, Nurses' Health Study II, melatonin, reproductive cancers
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Nurses, Ovarian Neoplasms, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Work Schedule Tolerance, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review