Cited by 36Estrogen and related hormone effectsEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Assay reproducibility and interindividual variation for 15 serum estrogens and estrogen metabolites measured by liquid Chromatography–Tandem mass spectrometry

Open access
Fuhrman, Barbara J., Xu, Xia, Falk, Roni T., Dallal, Cher M., Veenstra, Timothy D., Keefer, Larry K., Graubard, Barry I., Brinton, Louise A. +2 more·2014·Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interindividual differences in estrogen metabolism may partially account for differences in risks of estrogen-responsive cancers. We conducted a proof-of-performance study to assess the reproducibility of a LC/MS-MS method for measurement of 15 serum estrogens and metabolites (all 15 termed EM) in total (conjugated+unconjugated) and unconjugated forms and describe interindividual variation. METHODS: Interindividual variation in serum EM profiles was evaluated for 20 premenopausal women, 15 postmenopausal women, and 10 men. Replicate aliquots from 10 premenopausal women, 5 postmenopausal women, and 5 men were assayed eight times over 4 weeks. Components of variance were used to calculate coefficients of variation (CV) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: In postmenopausal women and men, median EM concentrations were similar and substantially lower than that in premenopausal women. Within each sex/menopausal group, the sum of all EM varied 5- to 7-fold across extreme deciles. Some EM had greater variation; total estrone varied approximately 12-fold in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Unconjugated estradiol varied 17-fold in postmenopausal women but only 5-fold in premenopausal women and men. CVs reflecting variation across replicate measures for individuals were <5% for most EM, but higher in some individuals with a low EM concentration. Overall laboratory CVs for all but one EM were <2% and ICCs were >99% for all EM in each group. CONCLUSIONS: The serum EM assay has excellent laboratory reproducibility. In premenopausal women, postmenopausal women, and men, interindividual variation in EM measures is substantially greater than laboratory variation. IMPACT: The serum EM assay is suitable for epidemiologic application. See all the articles in this CEBP Focus section, "Biomarkers, Biospecimens, and New Technologies in Molecular Epidemiology."

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-0438

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 36

Authors
Fuhrman, B. J., Xu, X., Falk, R. T., Dallal, C. M., Veenstra, T. D., Keefer, L. K., Graubard, B. I., Brinton, L. A., Ziegler, R. G., & Gierach, G. L.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (US)
Corresponding author
Fuhrman, Barbara J.
Venue
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
Published
2014-12-01
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
2649-2657
ISSN
  • 1055-9965 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7755
OpenAlex
W2060348140
Cited by
36
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DigitalCommons-Cedarville (Cedarville University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Leidos
  • National Institutes of Health (HHSN261200800001C)
  • National Cancer Institute (HHSN261200800001E))
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
serum estrogen, estrogen metabolites, assay reproducibility, interindividual variability, estrone, estradiol glucuronide, estradiol sulfate
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Liquid, Estrogens, Female, Humans, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Premenopause, Postmenopause, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review