Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 490

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relationship between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations and Clinicopathologic Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancers

Tokumo, Masaki, Toyooka, Shinichi, Kiura, Katsuyuki, Shigematsu, Hisayuki, Tomii, Kunitoshi, Aoe, Motoi, Ichimura, Kouichi, Tsuda, Toshihide, Yano, Masaaki, Tsukuda, Kazunori, Tabata, Masahiro, Ueoka, Hiroshi, Tanimoto, Mitsune, Date, Hiroshi, Gazdar, Adi F., Shimizu, Nobuyoshi·2005·Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract

Purpose: Recent studies reported that clinical responsiveness to gefitinib was associated with somatic mutation of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). Here, we investigated the relationship between EGFR mutation and clinicopathologic features. Experimental Design: EGFR mutational status of 120 NSCLCs was determined mainly in EGFR exons 18 to 21 by direct sequence and correlated with clinicopathologic parameters. Results: EGFR mutations were present in 38 cases (32%) and the majority of mutations were in-frame deletions of exon 19 (19 cases) and a missense mutation in exon 21 (18cases). EGFR mutations were frequently associated with adenocarcinoma (P < 0.0001), never smoker (P < 0.0001), and female gender (P = 0.0001). Of interest, increasing smoke exposure was inversely related to the rate of EGFR mutation (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that smoking and histology were independent variables. Furthermore, gender difference was observed for the mutational location (P = 0.01) dominance of exon 19 for males and exon 21 for females. Twenty-one cases were treated with gefitinib and found that EGFR mutation was significantly related to gefitinib responsiveness (P = 0.002). In addition, median survival times of patients with and without EGFR mutations treated with gefitinib were 25.1 and 14.0 months, respectively. Patients with EGFR mutations had approximately 2-fold survival advantage; however, the difference was not significant. Conclusions: We show that EGFR mutations were significantly related to histology and smoke exposure and were a strong predictive factor for gefitinib responsiveness in NSCLC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.1167.11.3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 490

Metadata

Authors
Tokumo, M., Toyooka, S., Kiura, K., Shigematsu, H., Tomii, K., Aoe, M., Ichimura, K., Tsuda, T., Yano, M., Tsukuda, K., Tabata, M., Ueoka, H., Tanimoto, M., Date, H., Gazdar, A. F., & Shimizu, N.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2005-02-01
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
1167-1173
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W1931438814
Cited by
490
References
2
FWCI
48.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations and Clinicopathologic Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1078-0432.1167.11.3
The paper
Tokumo, M., Toyooka, S., Kiura, K., Shigematsu, H., Tomii, K., Aoe, M., Ichimura, K., Tsuda, T., Yano, M., Tsukuda, K., Tabata, M., Ueoka, H., Tanimoto, M., Date, H., Gazdar, A. F., & Shimizu, N. (2005). The Relationship between Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations and Clinicopathologic Features in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancers. Clinical Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.1167.11.3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.