The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relevance of Different UGT1A1 Polymorphisms in Irinotecan-Induced Toxicity
Abstract
Purpose: We wanted to assess polymorphisms in the uridine diphosphoglucuronosyl transferase 1A1 (UGT 1A1) gene: the TATA box polymorphism and UGT 1A1 G71R and Y486D mutations in the coding sequence, the main mutations characterizing Gilbert’s syndrome, as predictors of severe toxic event occurrence after irinotecan (CPT-11) administration. Therefore, we set up a rapid, sensitive, and reliable technique in routine practice to detect before CPT-11 treatment, the at-risk patients. Experimental Design: Seventy-five patients with advanced colorectal cancer and treated with CPT-11 and 5-fluorouracil, entered the study. We used the Pyrosequencing technology a real-time sequencing method, to detect the UGT 1A1 TATA box polymorphisms and mutations in the coding regions. Patients were also assessed for both biochemical and clinical evaluation and tolerance to treatment. Results: No G71R and Y486D mutations were found in our population. Frequencies for UGT 1A1 TATA box polymorphisms were 41, 47, and 9% for wild-type 6/6, heterozygous 6/7, and Gilbert’s syndrome 7/7, respectively. Tolerance to treatment decreased with increased number of TA repeat with 71% of the patients in 7/7 group who experienced grade 3/4 toxicity. Conclusions: The method we set up is suitable for the detection of UGT 1A1 polymorphism in routine practice before irinotecan treatment. It could help to detect the patients homozygous or heterozygous for Gilbert’s syndrome, at-risk of CPT 11-induced toxicity, and thus could help to individualize the dose to optimize efficacy and limit toxicity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strassburg, C. P. (2010) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2010.07.007 · Cited by 184
Irinotecan Inactivation Is Modulated by Epigenetic Silencing of UGT1A1 in Colon Cancer
Gagnon, J.-F., Bernard, O., Villeneuve, L., Têtu, B., & Guillemette, C. (2006) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-2130 · Cited by 93
Peeters, M., Strickland, A. H., Lichinitser, M., Suresh, A. V. S., Manikhas, G., Shapiro, J., Rogowski, W., Huang, X., Wu, B., Warner, D., et al. (2013) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2012.594 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Rouits, E., Boisdron-Celle, M., Dumont, A., Guérin, O., Morel, A., & Gamelin, E.
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5151-5159
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- OpenAlex
- W2121503597
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.