The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Macrophage Infiltration along the Tumor Front Correlates with Improved Survival in Colon Cancer
Abstract
Purpose: The role of macrophages in tumorigenesis is complex because they can both prevent and promote tumor development. Experimental Design: Four hundred forty-six colorectal cancer specimens were stained with the pan-monocyte/macrophage marker CD68, and average infiltration along the tumor front was semiquantitatively evaluated using a four-grade scale. Each section was similarly scored for the presence of CD68 hotspots. Some aspects of macrophage-tumor cell interactions were also studied using in vitro coculture systems. Results: Including all patients, regardless of surgical outcome and localization, survival increased incrementally with CD68TFMean infiltration grade (P = 0.0001) but not in curatively resected colon cancers (P = 0.28). CD68 hotspot score (CD68TFHotspot) was divided into high and low. A high hotspot score conferred a highly significant survival advantage also in curatively resected colon cancer cases (n = 199, P = 0.0002) but not in rectal cancers. CD68TFHotspot high turned out as an independent prognostic marker for colon cancer in multivariate analyses including gender, age, localization, grade, stage, tumor type, and lymphocytes at the tumor front, conferring a relative risk of 0.49 (P = 0.007). In vitro coculture experiments, using phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate–activated U937 cells as macrophage model, revealed that a high ratio of macrophages to colon cancer cells inhibited cancer cell growth. This was partially dependent on cell-to-cell contact, whereas Boyden chamber cocultivation without cell-to-cell contact promoted cancer cell spread. Conclusions: In conclusion, our data indicate that a dense macrophage infiltration at the tumor front positively influences prognosis in colon cancer and that the degree of cell-to-cell contact may influence the balance between protumorigenic and antitumorigenic properties of macrophages.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coussens, L. M., & Werb, Z. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01322 · Cited by 15,111
Cited by
Macrophages and metabolism in the tumor microenvironment
Vitale, I., Manic, G., Coussens, L. M., Kroemer, G., & Galluzzi, L. (2019) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.06.001 · Cited by 1,837
Macrophages as tools and targets in cancer therapy
Mantovani, A., Allavena, P., Marchesi, F., & Garlanda, C. (2022) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-022-00520-5 · Cited by 1,807
The immune contexture and Immunoscore in cancer prognosis and therapeutic efficacy
Bruni, D., Angell, H. K., & Galon, J. (2020) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-0285-7 · Cited by 1,586
Wei, C., Yang, C., Wang, S., Shi, D., Zhang, C., Lin, X., Liu, Q., Dou, R., & Xiong, B. (2019) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-019-0976-4 · Cited by 833
The role of myeloid cells in cancer therapies
Engblom, C., Pfirschke, C., & Pittet, M. J. (2016) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.54 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Forssell, J., Öberg, A., Henriksson, M. L., Stenling, R., Jung, A., & Palmqvist, R.
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1472-1479
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- OpenAlex
- W2112940058
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.