Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 265

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prediction of Recurrence-Free Survival in Postoperative Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients by Using an Integrated Model of Clinical Information and Gene Expression

Open access
Lee, Eung-Sirk, Son, Dae-Soon, Kim, Sung-Hyun, Lee, Jinseon, Jo, Jisuk, Han, Joungho, Kim, Heesue, Lee, Hyun Joo, Choi, Hye Young, Jung, Youngja, Park, Miyeon, Lim, Yu Sung, Kim, Kwhanmien, Shim, Young Mog, Kim, Byung Chul, Lee, Kyusang, Huh, Nam, Ko, Christopher, Park, Kyunghee, Lee, Jae Won, Choi, Yong Soo, Kim, Jhingook·2008·Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract

Purpose: One of the main challenges of lung cancer research is identifying patients at high risk for recurrence after surgical resection. Simple, accurate, and reproducible methods of evaluating individual risks of recurrence are needed. Experimental Design: Based on a combined analysis of time-to-recurrence data, censoring information, and microarray data from a set of 138 patients, we selected statistically significant genes thought to be predictive of disease recurrence. The number of genes was further reduced by eliminating those whose expression levels were not reproducible by real-time quantitative PCR. Within these variables, a recurrence prediction model was constructed using Cox proportional hazard regression and validated via two independent cohorts (n = 56 and n = 59). Results: After performing a log-rank test of the microarray data and successively selecting genes based on real-time quantitative PCR analysis, the most significant 18 genes had P values of <0.05. After subsequent stepwise variable selection based on gene expression information and clinical variables, the recurrence prediction model consisted of six genes (CALB1, MMP7, SLC1A7, GSTA1, CCL19, and IFI44). Two pathologic variables, pStage and cellular differentiation, were developed. Validation by two independent cohorts confirmed that the proposed model is significantly accurate (P = 0.0314 and 0.0305, respectively). The predicted median recurrence-free survival times for each patient correlated well with the actual data. Conclusions: We have developed an accurate, technically simple, and reproducible method for predicting individual recurrence risks. This model would potentially be useful in developing customized strategies for managing lung cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-07-4937

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lee, E.-S., Son, D.-S., Kim, S.-H., Lee, J., Jo, J., Han, J., Kim, H., Lee, H. J., Choi, H. Y., Jung, Y., Park, M., Lim, Y. S., Kim, K., Shim, Y. M., Kim, B. C., Lee, K., Huh, N., Ko, C., Park, K., Lee, J. W., Choi, Y. S., & Kim, J.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2008-11-14
Volume
14
Issue
22
Pages
7397-7404
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2147925490
Cited by
265
References
2
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.