Pancreatic cancer screening in a prospective cohort of high-risk patients: a comprehensive strategy of imaging and genetics
Abstract
Purpose: Pancreatic cancer is a virtually uniformly fatal disease. We aimed to determine if screening to identify curable neoplasms is effective when offered to patients at high risk. Experimental Design: Patients at high risk of pancreatic cancer were prospectively enrolled into a screening program. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and genetic testing were offered by a multidisciplinary team according to each patient's risk. Results: Fifty-one patients in 43 families were enrolled, with mean age of 52 years, 35% of whom were male. Of these patients, 31 underwent EUS and 33 MRI. EUS revealed two patients with pancreatic cancer (one resectable, one metastatic), five with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), seven with cysts, and six with parenchymal changes. Five had pancreatic surgery (one total pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer, three distal and one central pancreatectomy for pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and IPMN). A total of 24 (47%) had genetic testing (19 for BRCA1/2 mutations, 4 for CDKN2A, 1 for MLH1/MSH2) and 7 were positive for BRCA1/2 mutations. Four extrapancreatic neoplasms were found: two ovarian cancers on prophylactic total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, one carcinoid, and one papillary thyroid carcinoma. Overall, 6 (12%) of the 51 patients had neoplastic lesions in the pancreas and 9 (18%) had neoplasms in any location. All were on the initial round of screening. All patients remain alive and without complications of screening. Conclusions: Pancreatic cancer screening for high-risk patients with a comprehensive strategy of imaging and genetics is effective and identifies curable neoplasms that can be resected. Ongoing study will better define who will benefit from screening and what screening strategy will be the most effective. Clin Cancer Res; 16(20); 5028–37. ©2010 AACR.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Medical imaging has been shown to detect precancerous tissue changes in the pancreas among individuals at high risk.
“The ability to detect precancerous tissue changes in the pancreas using medical imaging among individuals at high risk has also been shown.110,122–125”
From Early detection of pancreatic cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [125]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 201
- Authors
- Verna, E. C., Hwang, C., Stevens, P. D., Rotterdam, H., Stavropoulos, S. N., Sy, C. D., Prince, M. A., Chung, W. K., Fine, R. L., Chabot, J. A., & Frucht, H.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2010-10-13
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 5028-5037
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- OpenAlex
- W2043469950
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
- Keywords
- pancreatic cancer screening, high-risk patients, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, genetic testing, BRCA mutations, CDKN2A, hereditary cancer, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia, pancreatic cysts, pancreatic resection
- MeSH terms
- MutL Protein Homolog 1, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nuclear Proteins, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, p16, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genes, BRCA2, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, MutS Homolog 2 Protein, Early Detection of Cancer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review