Inhibitors Targeting Mitosis: Tales of How Great Drugs against a Promising Target Were Brought Down by a Flawed Rationale
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
Although they have been advocated with an understandable enthusiasm, mitosis-specific agents such as inhibitors of mitotic kinases and kinesin spindle protein have not been successful clinically. These drugs were developed as agents that would build on the success of microtubule-targeting agents while avoiding the neurotoxicity that encumbers drugs such as taxanes and vinca alkaloids. The rationale for using mitosis-specific agents was based on the thesis that the clinical efficacy of microtubule-targeting agents could be ascribed to the induction of mitotic arrest. However, the latter concept, which has long been accepted as dogma, is likely important only in cell culture and rapidly growing preclinical models, and irrelevant in patient tumors, where interference with intracellular trafficking on microtubules is likely the principal mechanism of action. Here we review the preclinical and clinical data for a diverse group of inhibitors that target mitosis and identify the reasons why these highly specific, myelosuppressive compounds have failed to deliver on their promise. Clin Cancer Res; 18(1); 51–63. ©2012 AACR.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The interphase effects of microtubule-targeting agents probably contribute to their clinical efficacy.
“Although the perturbation of mitosis has long been regarded as the explanation for the anti-tumour effects of MTAs, drugs specifically targeting the formation of the mitotic spindle, such as kinesin-5 inhibitors, have shown disappointing results in the clinic, suggesting that the interphase effects of MTAs probably contribute to their clinical efficacy 11,12 .”
From Taxane-induced conformational changes in the microtubule lattice activate GEF-H1-dependent RhoA signalling (2026) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 125 · Cited by 227
- Authors
- Komlodi-Pasztor, E., Sackett, D. L., & Fojo, A. T.
- Affiliations
- Authors' Affiliations: 1Medical Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, and 2Program in Physical Biology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
- National Cancer Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fojo, Antonio Tito
- ORCID
- Sackett, Dan L.
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-63
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- OpenAlex
- W2125610733
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 125
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 2.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and biological activity
- Keywords
- kinesin spindle protein inhibitor, microtubule inhibitors, mitotic arrest, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, myelosuppression, drug failure, antimitotic agents
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Mitosis, Neoplasms, Antimitotic Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review