Cited by 176Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsBrain Metastases and TreatmentLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The Impact of Initial Gefitinib or Erlotinib versus Chemotherapy on Central Nervous System Progression in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Mutations

Open access
Heon, Stephanie, Yeap, Beow Y., Lindeman, Neal I., Joshi, Victoria A., Butaney, Mohit, Britt, Gregory J., Costa, Daniel B., Rabin, Michael S. +2 more·2012·Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract

PURPOSE: This retrospective study was undertaken to investigate the impact of initial gefitinib or erlotinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, EGFR-TKI) versus chemotherapy on the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with stage IV or relapsed NSCLC with a sensitizing EGFR mutation initially treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, or chemotherapy were identified. The cumulative risk of CNS progression was calculated using death as a competing risk. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-five patients were eligible (EGFR-TKI: 101, chemotherapy: 54). Twenty-four patients (24%) in the EGFR-TKI group and 12 patients (22%) in the chemotherapy group had brain metastases at the time of diagnosis of advanced NSCLC (P = 1.000); 32 of the 36 received CNS therapy before initiating systemic treatment. Thirty-three patients (33%) in the EGFR-TKI group and 26 patients (48%) in the chemotherapy group developed CNS progression after a median follow-up of 25 months. The 6-, 12-, and 24-month cumulative risk of CNS progression was 1%, 6%, and 21% in the EGFR-TKI group compared with corresponding rates of 7%, 19%, and 32% in the chemotherapy group (P = 0.026). The HR of CNS progression for upfront EGFR-TKI versus chemotherapy was 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.34-0.94]. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show lower rates of CNS progression in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC patients initially treated with an EGFR-TKI compared with upfront chemotherapy. If validated, our results suggest that gefitinib and erlotinib may have a role in the chemoprevention of CNS metastases from NSCLC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-0357

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 176

Authors
Heon, S., Yeap, B. Y., Lindeman, N. I., Joshi, V. A., Butaney, M., Britt, G. J., Costa, D. B., Rabin, M. S., Jackman, D. M., & Johnson, B. E.
Affiliations
  • Authors' Affiliations: 1Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; 2Departments of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and 3Brigham and Women's Hospital; 4Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital; 5Departments of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, 6Brigham and Women's Hospital, and 7Massachusetts General Hospital; 8Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Bruce E.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2012-08-14
Volume
18
Issue
16
Pages
4406-4414
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2155894313
Cited by
176
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA114465, P50CA090578, 5R01-CA114465)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Brain Metastases and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
gefitinib, erlotinib, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, EGFR mutation, non-small cell lung cancer, central nervous system progression, brain metastases, chemotherapy, upfront treatment, chemoprevention, competing risk analysis
MeSH terms
Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Gefitinib, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Quinazolines, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Disease Progression, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review