Cited by 129Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingProtein Tyrosine Phosphatases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Molecular pathways: adaptive kinome reprogramming in response to targeted inhibition of the BRAF-MEK-ERK pathway in cancer

Open access

Abstract

The central role of the BRAF–MEK–ERK pathway in controlling cell fate has made this pathway a primary target for deregulated activation in cancer. BRaf is activated by Ras proteins allowing Ras oncogenes to constitutively activate the pathway. Activating BRaf mutations are also frequent in several cancers, being the most common oncogenic mutation in thyroid carcinoma and melanoma. There are currently two inhibitors, vemurafenib and dabrafenib, approved for treatment of malignant melanoma having activating BRaf mutations. Concurrent administration of BRAF and MAP–ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitor (trametinib) is significantly more active in patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma than either single agent alone, but progression to resistance ultimately occurs by different mechanisms that increase the activation of extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK). Such adaptive changes in tumor cell signaling networks allow bypass of targeted oncoprotein inhibition. This is true with targeted inhibitors for BRaf and MEK as well as specific inhibitors for AKT, mTOR, and many receptor tyrosine kinases such as EGF receptor (EGFR) and HER2. It is this adaptive response to targeted kinase inhibitors that contributes to the failure of single-agent kinase inhibitors to have durable responses. This failure is seen in virtually all cancers treated with single-agent kinase inhibitors, most of which are not as dependent on a single signaling pathway such as BRaf–MEK–ERK in melanoma. Thus, understanding the breadth of adaptive reprogramming responses to specific targeted kinase inhibition will be critical to develop appropriate combination therapies for durable clinical responses. Clin Cancer Res; 20(10); 2516–22. ©2014 AACR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-1081

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HER family and FGFR signaling are key mediators of adaptive feedback to RAS-MAPK pathway inhibitors.

    “This finding is consistent with prior studies identifying HER family and FGFR signaling as key mediators of adaptive feedback to RAS-MAPK pathway inhibitors (10–14,21,22) and recent functional genomic screens(40).”

    From Vertical Pathway Inhibition Overcomes Adaptive Feedback Resistance to KRASG12C Inhibition (2020) · cites this paper as [22]

    Clinical-Translational Advances (page unavailable) describes receptor tyrosine kinase upregulation as an adaptive response to MEK inhibition, and Concluding Remarks gives a HER-family-targeting combination as an example. The copy does not identify FGFR signaling as a mediator of that feedback, so it supports only part of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 129

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, G. L., Stuhlmiller, T. J., Angus, S. P., Zawistowski, J. S., & Graves, L. M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2014-05-14
Volume
20
Issue
10
Pages
2516-2522
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2115424172
Cited by
129
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CA58223)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-58223, T32CA009156, CA009156, P50CA058223, P30CA016086)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM101141, GM101141)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
Keywords
adaptive resistance, kinase inhibitor resistance, vemurafenib, dabrafenib, trametinib, melanoma, BRAF mutation, oncogenic Ras, ERK activation, combination therapy, targeted therapy
MeSH terms
Vemurafenib, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Imidazoles, Indoles, Melanoma, Models, Biological, Mutation, Neoplasms, Oximes, Phosphorylation, Protein-Tyrosine Kinases, Pyridones, Pyrimidinones, Sulfonamides, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases, MAP Kinase Kinase 1, MAP Kinase Kinase 2, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review