Dual CDK4/CDK6 Inhibition Induces Cell-Cycle Arrest and Senescence in Neuroblastoma
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Purpose: Neuroblastoma is a pediatric cancer that continues to exact significant morbidity and mortality. Recently, a number of cell-cycle proteins, particularly those within the Cyclin D/CDK4/CDK6/RB network, have been shown to exert oncogenic roles in neuroblastoma, suggesting that their therapeutic exploitation might improve patient outcomes. Experimental Procedures: We evaluated the effect of dual CDK4/CDK6 inhibition on neuroblastoma viability using LEE011 (Novartis Oncology), a highly specific CDK4/6 inhibitor. Results: Treatment with LEE011 significantly reduced proliferation in 12 of 17 human neuroblastoma-derived cell lines by inducing cytostasis at nanomolar concentrations (mean IC50 = 307 ± 68 nmol/L in sensitive lines). LEE011 caused cell-cycle arrest and cellular senescence that was attributed to dose-dependent decreases in phosphorylated RB and FOXM1, respectively. In addition, responsiveness of neuroblastoma xenografts to LEE011 translated to the in vivo setting in that there was a direct correlation of in vitro IC50 values with degree of subcutaneous xenograft growth delay. Although our data indicate that neuroblastomas sensitive to LEE011 were more likely to contain genomic amplification of MYCN (P = 0.01), the identification of additional clinically accessible biomarkers is of high importance. Conclusions: Taken together, our data show that LEE011 is active in a large subset of neuroblastoma cell line and xenograft models, and supports the clinical development of this CDK4/6 inhibitor as a therapy for patients with this disease. Clin Cancer Res; 19(22); 6173–82. ©2013 AACR.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is evidence of a beneficial effect of both pro-senescent and anti-senescent approaches, depending on context.
“There is evidence of a beneficial effect of both pro-senescent and anti-senescent approaches, depending on context.”
From Ageing, Cellular Senescence and Neurodegenerative Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [295]
A pro-senescent effect may be desirable in treating cancer, renal, liver and cutaneous fibrosis.
“A pro-senescent effect may be desirable in treating cancer [295,296,297], renal, liver and cutaneous fibrosis [298,299,300,301].”
From Ageing, Cellular Senescence and Neurodegenerative Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [295]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 394
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [36]Canavese M Santo L Raje N Cyclin dependent kinases in cancer: potential for therapeutic intervention Cancer biology & therapy 2012 13 451 7 22361734
- Authors
- Rader, J., Russell, M. R., Hart, L. S., Nakazawa, M. S., Belcastro, L. T., Martinez, D., Li, Y., Carpenter, E. L., Attiyeh, E. F., Diskin, S. J., Kim, S., Parasuraman, S., Caponigro, G., Schnepp, R. W., Wood, A. C., Pawel, B., Cole, K. A., & Maris, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Authors' Affiliations: 1Division of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research; 2Division of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; 3Department of Pediatrics; 4Abramson Family Cancer Research Institute, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and 5Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Corresponding author
- Maris, John M.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2013-11-14
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 6173-6182
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- PMC
- PMC3844928
- OpenAlex
- W2133382697
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 13
- FWCI
- 16.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (T32CA009615, P30CA016520)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
- Keywords
- neuroblastoma, CDK4/6 inhibition, ribociclib, cell cycle arrest, cellular senescence, retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation, FOXM1, MYCN amplification, tumor xenografts, cell proliferation, biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- N-Myc Proto-Oncogene Protein, Forkhead Box Protein M1, Aminopyridines, Animals, Child, Humans, Neoplasm Transplantation, Neuroblastoma, Nuclear Proteins, Phosphorylation, Purines, Transplantation, Heterologous, Signal Transduction, Oncogene Proteins, Retinoblastoma Protein, Mice, SCID, Cellular Senescence, Apoptosis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, RNA Interference, RNA, Small Interfering, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Cell Proliferation, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6, Mice, Forkhead Transcription Factors, Cell Cycle Checkpoints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review