Cited by 63Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysMathematical Biology Tumor GrowthPI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer

Preclinical Optimization of MDM2 Antagonist Scheduling for Cancer Treatment by Using a Model-Based Approach

Open access
Higgins, Brian, Glenn, Kelli, Walz, Antje, Tovar, Christian, Filipovic, Zoran, Hussain, Sazzad, Lee, Edmund, Kolinsky, Kenneth +8 more·2014·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: Antitumor clinical activity has been demonstrated for the MDM2 antagonist RG7112, but patient tolerability for the necessary daily dosing was poor. Here, utilizing RG7388, a second-generation nutlin with superior selectivity and potency, we determine the feasibility of intermittent dosing to guide the selection of initial phase I scheduling regimens. Experimental Design: A pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model was developed on the basis of preclinical data to determine alternative dosing schedule requirements for optimal RG7388-induced antitumor activity. This PKPD model was used to investigate the pharmacokinetics of RG7388 linked to the time-course of the antitumor effect in an osteosarcoma xenograft model in mice. These data were used to prospectively predict intermittent and continuous dosing regimens, resulting in tumor stasis in the same model system. Results: RG7388-induced apoptosis was delayed relative to drug exposure with continuous treatment not required. In initial efficacy testing, daily dosing at 30 mg/kg and twice a week dosing at 50 mg/kg of RG7388 were statistically equivalent in our tumor model. In addition, weekly dosing of 50 mg/kg was equivalent to 10 mg/kg given daily. The implementation of modeling and simulation on these data suggested several possible intermittent clinical dosing schedules. Further preclinical analyses confirmed these schedules as viable options. Conclusion: Besides chronic administration, antitumor activity can be achieved with intermittent schedules of RG7388, as predicted through modeling and simulation. These alternative regimens may potentially ameliorate tolerability issues seen with chronic administration of RG7112, while providing clinical benefit. Thus, both weekly (qw) and daily for five days (5 d on/23 off, qd) schedules were selected for RG7388 clinical testing. Clin Cancer Res; 20(14); 3742–52. ©2014 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-0460

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 63

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Higgins B, Tovar C, Glenn K, Walz A, Filipovic Z, Zhang YE, et al. Antitumour activity of the MDM2 antagonist RG7388 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2013 Oct 19-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia, PA: AACR; 2013. Abstract nr B55.

Authors
Higgins, B., Glenn, K., Walz, A., Tovar, C., Filipovic, Z., Hussain, S., Lee, E., Kolinsky, K., Tannu, S., Adames, V., Garrido, R., Linn, M., Meille, C., Heimbrook, D., Vassilev, L., & Packman, K.
Affiliations
  • Authors' Affiliations: 1Discovery Oncology;
  • 2Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics; and
  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
  • 3Non-Clinical Safety, Pharma Research and Early Development, Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Nutley, New Jersey; and
Corresponding author
Higgins, Brian
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2014-07-14
Volume
20
Issue
14
Pages
3742-3752
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W1978978593
Cited by
63
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer
Keywords
MDM2 inhibitors, RG7388, nutlin, dosing schedule optimization, intermittent dosing, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling, modeling and simulation, apoptosis, RG7112, tolerability, phase I clinical trial design
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Bone Neoplasms, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Mice, Nude, Pyrrolidines, Osteosarcoma, Apoptosis, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Imidazolines, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2, para-Aminobenzoates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review