Cited by 203Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsPancreatitis Pathology and Treatment

Identification of a three-biomarker panel in urine for early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Open access
Radon, Tomasz P., Massat, Nathalie J., Jones, Richard, Alrawashdeh, Wasfi, Dumartin, Laurent, Ennis, Darren, Duffy, Stephen W., Kocher, Hemant M. +10 more·2015·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

PURPOSE: Noninvasive biomarkers for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are currently not available. Here, we aimed to identify a set of urine proteins able to distinguish patients with early-stage PDAC from healthy individuals. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Proteomes of 18 urine samples from healthy controls, chronic pancreatitis, and patients with PDAC (six/group) were assayed using GeLC/MS/MS analysis. The selected biomarkers were subsequently validated with ELISA assays using multiple logistic regression applied to a training dataset in a multicenter cohort comprising 488 urine samples. RESULTS: LYVE-1, REG1A, and TFF1 were selected as candidate biomarkers. When comparing PDAC (n = 192) with healthy (n = 87) urine specimens, the resulting areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) of the panel were 0.89 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.84-0.94] in the training (70% of the data) and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86-0.98) in the validation (30% of the data) datasets. When comparing PDAC stage I-II (n = 71) with healthy urine specimens, the panel achieved AUCs of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.84-0.96) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.84-1.00) in the training and validation datasets, respectively. In PDAC stage I-II and healthy samples with matching plasma CA19.9, the panel achieved a higher AUC of 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) than CA19.9 (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95, P = 0.005). Adding plasma CA19.9 to the panel increased the AUC from 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99) to 0.99 (95% CI, 0.97-1.00, P = 0.04), but did not improve the comparison of stage I-IIA PDAC (n = 17) with healthy urine. CONCLUSIONS: We have established a novel, three-protein biomarker panel that is able to detect patients with early-stage pancreatic cancer in urine specimens.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-2467

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 203

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]Furukawa H Okada S Saisho H Ariyama J Karasawa E Nakaizumi A Clinicopathologic features of small pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A collective study Cancer 1996 78 986 90 8780535
  2. [28]Kimura N Yonekura H Okamoto H Nagura H Expression of human regenerating gene mRNA and its product in normal and neoplastic human pancreas Cancer 1992 70 1857 63 1525759

Authors
Radon, T. P., Massat, N. J., Jones, R., Alrawashdeh, W., Dumartin, L., Ennis, D., Duffy, S. W., Kocher, H. M., Pereira, S. P., Guarner (posthumous), L., Murta-Nascimento, C., Real, F. X., Malats, N., Neoptolemos, J., Costello, E., Greenhalf, W., Lemoine, N. R., & Crnogorac-Jurcevic, T.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • 3MS Bioworks, LLC, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • University College London (GB)
  • 6Hospital General Universitari Vall Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
  • 7Hospital del Mar — Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (ES)
  • 9The NIHR Liverpool Pancreas Biomedical Research Unit, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • 1Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2015-08-01
Volume
21
Issue
15
Pages
3512-3521
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W1929411275
Cited by
203
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pancreatic Cancer UK (RG2014_01_PERERIA, 2013 RIF)
  • Cancer Research UK (16812, A12008, 15957, 12008)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-0407-13363, NF-SI-0510-10126)
  • National Cancer Institute (P01CA084203)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Keywords
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, early cancer detection, urinary biomarkers, non-invasive diagnosis, LYVE-1, REG1A, TFF1, CA19-9, chronic pancreatitis, early-stage pancreatic cancer, diagnostic accuracy, plasma biomarkers, liquid biopsy
MeSH terms
Trefoil Factor-1, Adenocarcinoma, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Proteome, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Vesicular Transport Proteins, Lithostathine, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Early Detection of Cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review