Cited by 20Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesBreast Lesions and CarcinomasGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HAGE in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Is a Novel Prognostic, Predictive, and Actionable Biomarker: A Transcriptomic and Protein Expression Analysis

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: The expression of HAGE as a novel prognostic and predictive tool was assessed in 1,079 triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). Experimental Design: HAGE protein expression was investigated in an early primary TNBC (EP-TNBC; n = 520) cohort who received adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) and in a locally advanced primary TNBC cohort who received anthracycline combination Neo-ACT (n = 110; AC-Neo-ACT). HAGE-mRNA expression was evaluated in the METABRIC-TNBC cohort (n = 311) who received ACT and in a cohort of patients with TNBC who received doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide Neo-ACT, followed by 1:1 randomization to ixabepilone (n = 68) or paclitaxel (n = 64) as part of a phase II clinical trial. Furthermore, a cohort of 128 tumors with integrated HAGE gene copy number changes, mRNA, and protein levels were analyzed. Results: In patients with EP-TNBC, who were chemotherapy-naïve, high HAGE protein expression (HAGE+) was associated with a higher risk of death [HR, 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2–1.5; P = 0.000005] when compared with HAGE− cases. Patients who received ACT and expressed mRNA-HAGE+ were at a lower risk of death than those who were mRNA–HAGE− (P = 0.004). The expression of HAGE was linked to the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL), and both features were found to be independent predictors for pathologic complete response (pCR, P < 0.001) and associated with prolonged survival (P < 0.01), following AC-Neo-ACT. In patients with residual disease, HAGE+ had a 2-fold death risk increase (P = 0.018) compared with HAGE−. Conclusions: HAGE expression is a potential prognostic marker and a predictor of response to anthracycline treatment in TNBC. A prospective clinical trial to examine the therapeutic value of HAGE for TNBC cases is warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 22(4); 905–14. ©2015 AACR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-15-0610

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Ossovskaya, 2011, Exploring molecular pathways of triple-negative breast cancer, Genes Cancer, 2, 870, 10.1177/1947601911432496 · DOI
  2. Abdel-Fatah, 2013, Bcl2 is an independent prognostic marker of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and predicts response to anthracycline combination (ATC) chemotherapy (CT) in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, Ann Oncol, 24, 2801, 10.1093/annonc/mdt277 · DOI
  3. West, 2011, Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer, Breast Cancer Res, 13, R126, 10.1186/bcr3072 · DOI
  4. Stagg, 2013, Immunotherapeutic approaches in triple-negative breast cancer: latest research and clinical prospects, Ther Adv Med Oncol, 5, 169, 10.1177/1758834012475152 · DOI
  5. Loi, 2014, Host antitumor immunity plays a role in the survival of patients with newly diagnosed triple-negative breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 32, 2935, 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.7677 · DOI
  6. Adams, 2014, Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancers from two phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trials: ECOG 2197 and ECOG 1199, J Clin Oncol, 32, 2959, 10.1200/JCO.2013.55.0491 · DOI
  7. Lehmann, 2011, Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies, J Clin Invest, 121, 2750, 10.1172/JCI45014 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Suri, 2012, Cancer testis antigens: A new paradigm for cancer therapy, OncoImmunology, 1, 1194, 10.4161/onci.20686 · DOI
  9. Abdel-Fatah, 2014, HAGE (DDX43) is a biomarker for poor prognosis and a predictor of chemotherapy response in breast cancer, Br J Cancer, 110, 2450, 10.1038/bjc.2014.168 · DOI
  10. Mathieu, 2007, HAGE, a cancer/testis antigen with potential for melanoma immunotherapy: identification of several MHC class I/II HAGE-derived immunogenic peptides, Cancer Immunol Immunother, 56, 1885, 10.1007/s00262-007-0331-2 · DOI
  11. Adams, 2002, Frequent expression of HAGE in presentation chronic myeloid leukaemias, Leukemia, 16, 2238, 10.1038/sj.leu.2402732 · DOI
  12. Pinder, 1994, Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. III. Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long-term follow-up, Histopathology, 24, 41, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1994.tb01269.x · DOI
  13. Curtis, 2012, The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumors reveals novel subgroups, Nature, 486, 346, 10.1038/nature10983 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Denkert, 2010, Tumor-associated lymphocytes as an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 28, 105, 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.7370 · DOI
  15. Symmans, 2007, Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, J Clin Oncol, 25, 4414, 10.1200/JCO.2007.10.6823 · DOI
  16. Saura, 2013, Neoadjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by ixabepilone or paclitaxel in early stage breast cancer and evaluation of betaIII-tubulin expression as a predictive marker, Oncologist, 18, 787, 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0075 · DOI
  17. Horak, 2013, Biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by ixabepilone or Paclitaxel in early-stage breast cancer, Clin Cancer Res, 19, 1587, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1359 · DOI
  18. Lancashire, 2010, A validated gene expression profile for detecting clinical outcome in breast cancer using artificial neural networks, Breast Cancer Res Treat, 120, 83, 10.1007/s10549-009-0378-1 · DOI
  19. Smoot, 2011, Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization, Bioinformatics, 27, 431, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq675 · DOI
  20. Smyth, 2004, Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments, Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol, 3, Article3, 10.2202/1544-6115.1027 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Mathieu, 2010, HAGE, a cancer/testis antigen expressed at the protein level in a variety of cancers, Cancer Immun, 10, 2
  22. Hammond, 2010, American society of clinical oncology/college of american pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer, J Oncol Pract, 6, 195, 10.1200/JOP.777003 · DOI
  23. Wolff, 2007, American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer, J Clin Oncol, 25, 118, 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.2775 · DOI
  24. Chin, 2007, High-resolution aCGH and expression profiling identifies a novel genomic subtype of ER negative breast cancer, Genome Biol, 8, R215, 10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r215 · DOI
  25. McShane, 2005, Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK), J Natl Cancer Inst, 97, 1180, 10.1093/jnci/dji237 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Curigliano, 2011, Cancer–testis antigen expression in triple-negative breast cancer, Ann Oncol, 22, 98, 10.1093/annonc/mdq325 · DOI
  27. Roman-Gomez, 2007, Epigenetic regulation of human cancer/testis antigen gene, HAGE, in chronic myeloid leukemia, Haematologica, 92, 153, 10.3324/haematol.10782 · DOI
  28. Bertheau, 2008, TP53 status and response to chemotherapy in breast cancer, Pathobiology, 75, 132, 10.1159/000123851 · DOI
  29. Linley, 2012, The helicase HAGE expressed by malignant melanoma-initiating cells is required for tumor cell proliferation in vivo, J Biol Chem, 287, 13633, 10.1074/jbc.M111.308973 · DOI
  30. Weir, 2011, Immune modulation by chemotherapy or immunotherapy to enhance cancer vaccines, Cancers, 3, 3114, 10.3390/cancers3033114 · DOI
  31. Kyte, 2011, Telomerase peptide vaccination combined with temozolomide: a clinical trial in stage IV melanoma patients, Clin Cancer Res, 17, 4568, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0184 · DOI
  32. Slingluff, 2011, Randomized multicenter trial of the effects of melanoma-associated helper peptides and cyclophosphamide on the immunogenicity of a multipeptide melanoma vaccine, J Clini Oncol, 29, 2924, 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.8053 · DOI
  33. Neninger, 2009, Combining an EGF-based cancer vaccine with chemotherapy in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer, J Immunother, 32, 92, 10.1097/CJI.0b013e31818fe167 · DOI
  34. Sampson, 2011, Greater chemotherapy-induced lymphopenia enhances tumor-specific immune responses that eliminate EGFRvIII-expressing tumor cells in patients with glioblastoma, Neuro Oncol, 13, 324, 10.1093/neuonc/noq157 · DOI
  35. Laurence, 2008, Immunological aspects of cancer chemotherapy, Nat Rev Immunol, 8, 59, 10.1038/nri2216 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Issa, 2004, Phase 1 study of low-dose prolonged exposure schedules of the hypomethylating agent 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in hematopoietic malignancies, Blood, 103, 1635, 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0687 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Abdel-Fatah, T. M. A., McArdle, S. E. B., Agarwal, D., Moseley, P. M., Green, A. R., Ball, G. R., Pockley, A. G., Ellis, I. O., Rees, R. C., & Chan, S. Y. T.
Affiliations
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
  • 2John van Geest Cancer Research Centre, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2016-02-14
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
905-914
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W1838159278
Cited by
20
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Keywords
Hage, triple-negative breast cancer, prognostic factors, predictive biomarkers, anthracycline response, adjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, pathological complete response, gene copy number, ixabepilone, paclitaxel, overall survival
MeSH terms
Adult, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Proteins, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Multivariate Analysis, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Treatment Outcome, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast, Disease-Free Survival, Neoadjuvant Therapy, Gene Expression Profiling, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, DEAD-box RNA Helicases, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations, Transcriptome, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review