The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Missed Opportunities and Lost Lives: Consequences of Some Proposed Changes to Regulations on Research with Human Tissues—Letter
Abstract
Archival collections of paraffin blocks remaining after the diagnosis and treatment of diseases are frequently touted as a “treasure” in the study of human diseases. If so, why are the Department of Health and Human Services and other federal departments and agencies proposing to put this
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The proposed changes have been the subject of intense debate.”
From Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens (2016) · cites this paper as [50]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Federal Register, Vol. 80, No. 173, Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects; Proposed Rules, September 8, 2015
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lessons from HeLa Cells: The Ethics and Policy of Biospecimens
Beskow, L. M. (2016) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022536 · Cited by 146
“Although some support the NPRM’s clarification and specification of procedures for biospecimen research (34), others say the consequences will be missed opportunities and lost lives caused by delays in important research (50).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Grizzle, W. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- Corresponding author
- Grizzle, William E.
- ORCID
- Grizzle, William E.
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2015-11-30
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 5404-5405
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- OpenAlex
- W2126600134
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Keywords
- tissue banking, federal regulatory policy, research ethics, cancer research
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Research, Specimen Handling, Tissue Banks, Ethics, Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
