Cited by 78Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling

Dysregulation of EGFR Pathway in EphA2 Cell Subpopulation Significantly Associates with Poor Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer

Open access
De Robertis, Mariangela, Loiacono, Luisa, Fusilli, Caterina, Poeta, Maria Luana, Mazza, Tommaso, Sanchez, Massimo, Marchionni, Luigi, Signori, Emanuela +4 more·2017·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: EphA2 receptor is involved in multiple cross-talks with other cellular networks, including EGFR, FAK, and VEGF pathways, with which it collaborates to stimulate cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. Colorectal cancer (CRC) EphA2 overexpression has also been correlated to stem-like properties of cells and tumor malignancy. We investigated the molecular cross-talk and miRNAs modulation of the EphA2 and EGFR pathways. We also explored the role of EphA2/EGFR pathway mediators as prognostic factors or predictors of cetuximab benefit in patients with CRC. Experimental Design: Gene expression analysis was performed in EphA2high cells isolated from CRC of the AOM/DSS murine model by FACS-assisted procedures. Six independent cohorts of patients were stratified by EphA2 expression to determine the potential prognostic role of a EphA2/EGFR signature and its effect on cetuximab treatment response. Results: We identified a gene expression pattern (EphA2, Efna1, Egfr, Ptpn12, and Atf2) reflecting the activation of EphA2 and EGFR pathways and a coherent dysregulation of mir-26b and mir-200a. Such a pattern showed prognostic significance in patients with stage I–III CRC, in both univariate and multivariate analysis. In patients with stage IV and WT KRAS, EphA2/Efna1/Egfr gene expression status was significantly associated with poor response to cetuximab treatment. Furthermore, EphA2 and EGFR overexpression showed a combined effect relative to cetuximab resistance, independently from KRAS mutation status. Conclusions: These results suggest that EphA2/Efna1/Egfr genes, linked to a possible control by miR-200a and miR-26b, could be proposed as novel CRC prognostic biomarkers. Moreover, EphA2 could be linked to a mechanism of resistance to cetuximab alternative to KRAS mutations. Clin Cancer Res; 23(1); 159–70. ©2016 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-0709

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EphR activation has been reported as a mechanism of resistance to cetuximab in CRC and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, suggesting cross talk between EphR and EGFR can amplify EGFR signaling.

    “Interestingly EphR activation has been reported as mechanism of resistance to cetuximab in CRC and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and CRC, suggesting that the cross talk between these two classes of RTKs can potentially amplify EGFR signaling(20).”

    From EGFR Blockade Reverts Resistance to KRASG12C Inhibition in Colorectal Cancer. (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports that studies in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and CRC suggested a role for EphA2 in responsiveness to cetuximab. The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) associate high EphA2 expression with poorer cetuximab response in CRC and suggest it may bypass EGFR-pathway inhibition. They do not establish EphR activation as the mechanism or show that crosstalk amplifies EGFR signaling. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. [1]Ferlay J Soerjomataram I Dikshit R Eser S Mathers C Rebelo M Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012 Int J Cancer 2015 136 E359 86 25220842
  2. [2]Siegel RL Miller KD Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2016 CA Cancer J Clin 2016 66 7 230 26742998
  3. [3]Cunningham D Atkin W Lenz HJ Lynch HT Minsky B Nordlinger B Colorectal cancer Lancet 2010 375 1030 47 20304247
  4. [4]Siravegna G Mussolin B Buscarino M Corti G Cassingena A Crisafulli Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patients Nat Med 2015 21 795 801 26030179 PMC4868598
  5. [5]Linnekamp JF Wang X Medema JP Vermeulen L Colorectal cancer heterogeneity and targeted therapy: a case for molecular disease subtypes Cancer Res 2015 75 245 9 25593032
  6. [6]Kreso A Dick JE Evolution of the cancer stem cell model Cell stem cell 2014 14 275 91 24607403
  7. [7]De Sousa E Melo F Wang X Jansen M Fessler E Trinh A Poor-prognosis colon cancer is defined by a molecularly distinct subtype and develops from serrated precursor lesions Nat Med 2013 19 614 8 23584090
  8. [8]Merlos-Suárez A Barriga FM Jung P Iglesias M Céspedes MV Rossell D The intestinal stem cell signature identifies colorectal cancer stem cells and predicts disease relapse Cell Stem Cell 2011 8 511 24 21419747
  9. [9]Boyd AW Bartlett PF Lackmann M Therapeutic targeting of EPH receptors and their ligands Nat Rev Drug Disc 2014 13 39 62 24378802
  10. [10]Herath NI Boyd AW The role of Eph receptors and ephrin ligands in colorectal cancer Int J Cancer 2010 126 2003 11 20039322
  11. [11]Smith JJ Deane NG Wu F Merchant NB Zhang B Jiang A Experimentally derived metastasis gene expression profile predicts recurrence and death in patients with colon cancer Gastroenterology 2010 138 958 68 19914252 PMC3388775
  12. [12]Brantley-Sieders DM Zhuang G Hicks D Fang WB Hwang Y Cates JM The receptor tyrosine kinase EphA2 promotes mammary adenocarcinoma tumorigenesis and metastatic progression in mice by amplifying ErbB2 signaling J Clin Invest 2008 118 6 78 18079969 PMC2129239
  13. [13]Larsen AB Stockhausen MT Poulsen HS Cell adhesion and EGFR activation regulate EphA2 expression in cancer Cellular Signalling 2010 22 636 44 19948216
  14. [14]Huang J Hu W Bottsford-Miller J Liu T Han HD Zand B Cross-talk between EphA2 and BRaf/CRaf is a key determinant of response to Dasatinib Clin Cancer Res 2014 20 1846 55 24486585 PMC3975695
  15. [15]Kotoula V Lambaki S Televantou D Kalogera-Fountzila A Nikolaou A Markou K STAT-related profiles are associated with patient response to targeted treatments in locally advanced SCCHN Transl Oncol 2011 4 47 58 21286377 PMC3026408
  16. [16]Strimpakos A Pentheroudakis G Kotoula V De Roock W Kouvatseas G Papakostas P The prognostic role of Ephrin A2 and Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor pathway mediators in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab Clin Colorectal Cancer 2013 12 267 74 24050852
  17. [17]Amato KR Wang S Tan L Hastings AK Song W Lovly CM EPHA2 Blockade Overcomes Acquired Resistance to EGFR Kinase Inhibitors in Lung Cancer Cancer Res 2016 76 305 18 26744526 PMC4715957
  18. [18]De Robertis M Massi E Poeta ML Carotti S Morini S Cecchetelli L The AOM/DSS murine model for the study of colon carcinogenesis: from pathways to diagnosis and therapy studies J Carcinog 2011 10 9 10.4103/1477-3163.78279 21483655 PMC3072657 · DOI
  19. [19]De Robertis M Arigoni M Loiacono L Riccardo F Calogero RA Feodorova Novel insights into Notum and glypicans regulation in colorectal cancer Oncotarget 2015 6 41237 57 26517809 PMC4747403
  20. [20]Workman P Aboagye EO Balkwill F Balmain A Bruder G Chaplin DJ Guidelines for the welfare and use of animals in cancer research British Journal of Cancer 2010 102 1555 77 20502460 PMC2883160
  21. [21]Roederer M Spectral compensation for flow cytometry: visualization artifacts, limitations, and caveats Cytometry 2001 45 194 205 11746088
  22. [22]Boivin GP Washington K Yang K Ward JM Pretlow T Russell R Pathology of mouse models of intestinal cancer: consensus report and recommendations Gastroenterology 2003 124 762 77 12612914
  23. [23]Lee KW Lee SS Kim SB Sohn BH Lee HS Jang HJ Significant association of oncogene YAP1 with poor prognosis and cetuximab resistance in colorectal cancer patients Clin Cancer Res 2015 21 357 64 25388162 PMC4513664
  24. [24]Jorissen RN Gibbs P Christie M Prakash S Lipton L Desai J Metastasis-associated gene expression changes predict poor outcomes in patients with dukes stage B and C colorectal cancer Clin Cancer Res 2009 15 7642 51 19996206 PMC2920750
  25. [25]Marisa L de Reyniès A Duval A Selves J Gaub MP Vescovo L Gene expression classification of colon cancer into molecular subtypes: characterization, validation, and prognostic value PLoS Med 2013 10 e1001453 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001453 23700391 PMC3660251 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [26]Sheffer M Bacolod MD Zuk O Giardina SF Pincas H Barany F Association of survival and disease progression with chromosomal instability: a genomic exploration of colorectal cancer Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009 106 7131 6 19359472 PMC2678450
  27. [27]Khambata-Ford S Garrett CR Meropol NJ Basik M Harbison CT Wu S Expression of epiregulin and amphiregulin and K-ras mutation status predict disease control in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab J Clin Oncol 2007 25 3230 7 17664471
  28. [28]The Cancer Genome Atlas Project Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer Nature 2012 487 330 7 22810696 PMC3401966
  29. [29]Munoz J Stange DE Schepers AG van de Wetering M Koo BK Itzkovitz S The Lgr5 intestinal stem cell signature: robust expression of proposed quiescent '+4' cell markers The EMBO journal 2012 31 3079 91 22692129 PMC3400017
  30. [31]Fang WB Brantley-Sieders DM Parker MA Reith AD Chen J A kinase-dependent role for EphA2 receptor in promoting tumor growth and metastasis Oncogene 2005 24 7859 68 16103880
  31. [32]Batlle E Henderson JT Beghtel H van den Born MM Sancho E Huls G β-Catenin and TCF mediate cell positioning in the Iintestinal epithelium by controlling the expression of EphB/EphrinB Cell 2002 111 251 63 12408869
  32. [33]Kinch MS Carles-Kinch K Overexpression and functional alterations of the EphA2 tyrosine kinase in cancer Clin Exp Metastasis 2003 20 59 68 12650608
  33. [34]Zelinski DP Zantek ND Stewart JC Irizarry AR Kinch MS EphA2 overexpression causes tumorigenesis of mammary epithelial cells Cancer Res 2001 61 2301 6 11280802
  34. [35]Wykosky J Gibo DM Stanton C Debinski W EphA2 as a novel molecular marker and target in glioblastoma multiforme Mol Cancer Res 2005 3 541 51 16254188
  35. [36]Tsouko E Wang J Frigo DE Aydoğdu E Williams C miR-200a inhibits migration of triple-negative breast cancer cells through direct repression of the EPHA2 oncogene Carcinogenesis 2015 36 1051 60 26088362 PMC5975720
  36. [37]Kikuchi S Kaibe N Morimoto K Fukui H Niwa H Maeyama Y Overexpression of Ephrin A2 receptors in cancer stromal cells is a prognostic factor for the relapse of gastric cancer Gastric Cancer 2015 18 485 94 24908114
  37. [38]Guo DL Zhang J Yuen ST Tsui WY Chan AS Ho C Reduced expression of EphB2 that parallels invasion and metastasis in colorectal tumours Carcinogenesis 2006 27 454 64 16272170
  38. [39]Dunne PD Dasgupta S Blayney JK McArt DG Redmond KL Weir JA EphA2 expression is a key driver of migration and invasion and a poor prognostic marker in colorectal cancer Clin Cancer Res 2015 22 230 42 26283684 PMC4694030
  39. [40]Binda E Visioli A Giani F Lamorte G Copetti M Pitter KL The EphA2 receptor drives self-renewal and tumorigenicity in stem-like tumor-propagating cells from human glioblastomas Cancer Cell 2012 22 765 80 23238013 PMC3922047
  40. [41]Gozdecka M Breitwieser W The roles of ATF2 (activating transcription factor 2) in tumorigenesis Biochem Soc Trans 2012 40 230 4 22260696
  41. [42]Paraiso KH Das Thakur M Fang B Koomen JM Fedorenko IV John J Ligand-independent EPHA2 signaling drives the adoption of a targeted therapy-mediated metastatic melanoma phenotype Cancer Discov 2015 5 264 73 25542447 PMC4355213
  42. [43]Coulthard MG Morgan M Woodruff TM Arumugam TV Taylor SM Carpenter TC Eph/Ephrin signaling in injury and inflammation Am J Pathol 2012 181 1493 503 23021982
  43. [44]Sun T Aceto N Meerbrey KL Kessler JD Zhou C Migliaccio I Activation of multiple proto-oncogenic tyrosine kinases in breast cancer via loss of the PTPN12 phosphatase Cell 2011 144 703 18 21376233 PMC6014607
  44. [45]Danielsen SA Eide PW Nesbakken A Guren T Leithe E Lothe RA Portrait of the PI3K/AKT pathway in colorectal cancer Biochim Biophys Acta 2015 1855 104 21 25450577
  45. [46]Carracedo A Pandolfi PP The PTEN-PI3K pathway: of feedbacks and cross-talks Oncogene 2008 27 5527 41 18794886
  46. [47]Wu N Zhao X Liu M Liu H Yao W Zhang Y Role of microRNA-26b in glioma development and its mediated regulation on EphA2 PLoS One 2011 6 e16264 21264258 PMC3021542
  47. [48]Aydoğdu E Katchy A Tsouko E Lin CY Haldosén LA Helguero L MicroRNA-regulated gene networks during mammary cell differentiation are associated with breast cancer Carcinogenesis 2012 33 1502 11 22562546
  48. [49]Brand TM Iida M Wheeler DL Molecular mechanisms of resistance to the EGFR monoclonal antibody cetuximab Cancer Biol Ther 2011 11 777 92 21293176 PMC3100630
  49. [50]Miao B Ji Z Tan L Taylor M Zhang J Choi HG EPHA2 is a mediator of vemurafenib resistance and a novel therapeutic target in melanoma Cancer Discov 2015 5 274 87 25542448 PMC4355085
  50. [51]Zhuang G Brantley-Sieders DM Vaught D Yu J Xie L Wells S Elevation of receptor tyrosine kinase EphA2 mediates resistance to trastuzumab therapy Cancer Res 2010 70 299 308 20028874 PMC3859619

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Robertis, M., Loiacono, L., Fusilli, C., Poeta, M. L., Mazza, T., Sanchez, M., Marchionni, L., Signori, E., Lamorte, G., Vescovi, A. L., Garcia-Foncillas, J., & Fazio, V. M.
Affiliations
  • 1Laboratory of Genetic and Clinical Pathology, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Università Campus Bio-Medico (IT)
  • Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT)
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Istituto di Farmacologia Traslazionale (IT)
  • 9Translational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, FIIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain.
Corresponding author
Fazio, Vito Michele
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
159-170
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2465842259
Cited by
78
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Regione Lazio–Progetti Imprenditoriali (ITINERIS 2)
  • MIUR (PON02_00576_3329762/3)
  • Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC IG 14368, AIRC MFAG 10520)
  • National Institute of Health (P30CA006973 and UL1 TR 001079)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Keywords
EphA2, EGFR, colorectal cancer, ephrin-A1, miR-200a, miR-26b, cetuximab resistance, KRAS wild-type, prognostic factors, gene expression signatures, AOM/DSS model, cell subpopulations, EGFR signaling
MeSH terms
Animals, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Models, Biological, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Neoplastic Stem Cells, Colorectal Neoplasms, Signal Transduction, Immunophenotyping, Gene Expression Profiling, Receptor, EphA2, Ephrin-A2, Mice, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Neoplasm Grading, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review