Cited by 373Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmune cells in cancerImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Entinostat neutralizes myeloid-derived suppressor cells and enhances the antitumor effect of PD-1 inhibition in murine models of lung and renal cell carcinoma

Open access
Orillion, Ashley, Hashimoto, Ayumi, Damayanti, Nur, Shen, Li, Adelaiye-Ogala, Remi, Arisa, Sreevani, Chintala, Sreenivasulu, Ordentlich, Peter +4 more·2017·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent advances in immunotherapy highlight the antitumor effects of immune checkpoint inhibition despite a relatively limited subset of patients receiving clinical benefit. The selective class I histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat has been reported to have immunomodulatory activity including targeting of immune suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment. Thus, we decided to assess whether entinostat could enhance anti-PD-1 treatment and investigate those alterations in the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that contribute to the combined antitumor activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We utilized syngeneic mouse models of lung (LLC) and renal cell (RENCA) carcinoma and assessed immune correlates, tumor growth, and survival following treatment with entinostat (5 or 10 mg/kg, p.o.) and a PD-1 inhibitor (10 and 20 mg/kg, s.c.). RESULTS: Entinostat enhanced the antitumor effect of PD-1 inhibition in two syngeneic mouse tumor models by reducing tumor growth and increasing survival. Entinostat inhibited the immunosuppressive function of both polymorphonuclear (PMN)- and monocytic-myeloid derived suppressor cell (M-MDSC) populations. Analysis of MDSC response to entinostat revealed significantly reduced arginase-1, iNOS, and COX-2 levels, suggesting potential mechanisms for the altered function. We also observed significant alterations in cytokine/chemokine release in vivo with a shift toward a tumor-suppressive microenvironment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that entinostat enhances the antitumor effect of PD-1 targeting through functional inhibition of MDSCs and a transition away from an immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment. These data provide a mechanistic rationale for the clinical testing and potential markers of response of this novel combination in solid tumor patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0741

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In syngeneic mouse models of lung and renal cell carcinoma, entinostat alone inhibited the immunosuppressive function of both polymorphonuclear and monocytic-myeloid-derived suppressor cell populations.

    “In syngeneic mouse models of lung and renal cell carcinoma, entinostat alone inhibited the immunosuppressive function of both polymorphonuclear and monocytic-myeloid-derived suppressor cell populations (Orillion et al., 2017).”

    From HDACs and the epigenetic plasticity of cancer cells: target the complexity (2022) · cites this paper as Orillion et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 373

Authors
Orillion, A., Hashimoto, A., Damayanti, N., Shen, L., Adelaiye-Ogala, R., Arisa, S., Chintala, S., Ordentlich, P., Kao, C., Elzey, B., Gabrilovich, D., & Pili, R.
Affiliations
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • The Wistar Institute (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Syndax Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • 1Gentourinary Program, Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Corresponding author
Gabrilovich, Dmitry
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2017-08-31
Volume
23
Issue
17
Pages
5187-5201
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2736006101
Cited by
373
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 3
FWCI
15.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Syndax Pharmaceuticals
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA010815)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
entinostat, histone deacetylase inhibitors, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, anti-PD-1 therapy, immune checkpoint blockade, lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, tumor microenvironment, immunosuppression, arginase-1, inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2, cytokine and chemokine secretion, combination immunotherapy
MeSH terms
Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells, Animals, Benzamides, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Immune Tolerance, Immunotherapy, Pyridines, Mice, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors, Tumor Microenvironment, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review