Cited by 114Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

PD-1 Blockade and CD27 Stimulation Activate Distinct Transcriptional Programs That Synergize for CD8+ T-Cell–Driven Antitumor Immunity

Open access
Buchan, Sarah L., Fallatah, Mohannad, Thirdborough, Stephen M., Taraban, Vadim Y., Rogel, Anne, Thomas, Lawrence J., Penfold, Christine A., He, Li-Zhen +3 more·2018·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: PD-1 checkpoint blockade has revolutionized the field of cancer immunotherapy, yet the frequency of responding patients is limited by inadequate T-cell priming secondary to a paucity of activatory dendritic cells (DC). DC signals can be bypassed by CD27 agonists, and we therefore investigated if the effectiveness of anti–PD-1/L1 could be improved by combining with agonist anti-CD27 monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Experimental Design: The efficacy of PD-1/L1 blockade or agonist anti-CD27 mAb was compared with a dual-therapy approach in multiple tumor models. Global transcriptional profiling and flow cytometry analysis were used to delineate mechanisms underpinning the observed synergy. Results: PD-1/PD-L1 blockade and agonist anti-CD27 mAb synergize for increased CD8+ T-cell expansion and effector function, exemplified by enhanced IFNγ, TNFα, granzyme B, and T-bet. Transcriptome analysis of CD8+ T cells revealed that combination therapy triggered a convergent program largely driven by IL2 and Myc. However, division of labor was also apparent such that anti–PD-1/L1 activates a cytotoxicity–gene expression program whereas anti-CD27 preferentially augments proliferation. In tumor models, either dependent on endogenous CD8+ T cells or adoptive transfer of transgenic T cells, anti-CD27 mAb synergized with PD-1/L1 blockade for antitumor immunity. Finally, we show that a clinically relevant anti-human CD27 mAb, varlilumab, similarly synergizes with PD-L1 blockade for protection against lymphoma in human–CD27 transgenic mice. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that suboptimal T-cell invigoration in cancer patients undergoing treatment with PD-1 checkpoint blockers will be improved by dual PD-1 blockade and CD27 agonism and provide mechanistic insight into how these approaches cooperate for CD8+ T-cell activation. Clin Cancer Res; 24(10); 2383–94. ©2018 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-3057

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 114

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Taraban VY Rowley TF O'Brien L Chan HT Haswell LE Green MH Expression and costimulatory effects of the TNF receptor superfamily members CD134 (OX40) and CD137 (4-1BB), and their role in the generation of anti-tumor immune responses Eur J Immunol 2002 32 3617 27 12516549

Authors
Buchan, S. L., Fallatah, M., Thirdborough, S. M., Taraban, V. Y., Rogel, A., Thomas, L. J., Penfold, C. A., He, L.-Z., Curran, M. A., Keler, T., & Al-Shamkhani, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Celldex Therapeutics (United States) (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • 1Cancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2018-05-14
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
2383-2394
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2790270315
Cited by
114
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Solent University Research Portal (Solent University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (RO1 DE023685)
  • Department of Veterans Affairs (CDA-2-057-10S)
  • Clinical Research of the University Würzburg (Z-2/59)
  • American Cancer Society (PF-16-087-01-TBG)
  • NIH (T32 CA108462, U54 CA209891)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
PD-1/PD-L1 blockade, varlilumab, CD8+ T cell activation, T cell priming, dendritic cells, combination cancer immunotherapy, transcriptional programs, interleukin-2, c-Myc, T-bet, granzyme B, antitumor immunity, lymphoma
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological, Animals, Cytotoxicity, Immunologic, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Lymphocyte Activation, Melanoma, Experimental, Mice, Transgenic, Neoplasms, Tumor Necrosis Factor Receptor Superfamily, Member 7, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Adoptive Transfer, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice, Immunomodulation, Transcriptome, Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review