Clinical Genomic Sequencing of Pediatric and Adult Osteosarcoma Reveals Distinct Molecular Subsets with Potentially Targetable Alterations
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Purpose: Although multimodal chemotherapy has improved outcomes for patients with osteosarcoma, the prognosis for patients who present with metastatic and/or recurrent disease remains poor. In this study, we sought to define how often clinical genomic sequencing of osteosarcoma samples could identify potentially actionable alterations. Experimental Design: We analyzed genomic data from 71 osteosarcoma samples from 66 pediatric and adult patients sequenced using MSK-IMPACT, a hybridization capture-based large panel next-generation sequencing assay. Potentially actionable genetic events were categorized according to the OncoKB precision oncology knowledge base, of which levels 1 to 3 were considered clinically actionable. Results: We found at least one potentially actionable alteration in 14 of 66 patients (21%), including amplification of CDK4 (n = 9, 14%: level 2B) and/or MDM2 (n = 9, 14%: level 3B), and somatic truncating mutations/deletions in BRCA2 (n = 3, 5%: level 2B) and PTCH1 (n = 1, level 3B). In addition, we observed mutually exclusive patterns of alterations suggesting distinct biological subsets defined by gains at 4q12 and 6p12-21. Specifically, potentially targetable gene amplifications at 4q12 involving KIT, KDR, and PDGFRA were identified in 13 of 66 patients (20%), which showed strong PDGFRA expression by IHC. In another largely nonoverlapping subset of 14 patients (24%) with gains at 6p12-21, VEGFA amplification was identified. Conclusions: We found potentially clinically actionable alterations in approximately 21% of patients with osteosarcoma. In addition, at least 40% of patients have tumors harboring PDGFRA or VEGFA amplification, representing candidate subsets for clinical evaluation of additional therapeutic options. We propose a new genomically based algorithm for directing patients with osteosarcoma to clinical trial options.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even the most successful molecular matching studies have identified few targetable mutations in patients with osteosarcoma.
“Even the most successful molecular matching studies have identified few targetable mutations in patients with osteosarcoma 79,80 .”
From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
The use of personalized medicine directed at somatic changes in osteosarcoma has grown more common alongside the development and testing of small-molecule inhibitors in other cancers.
“Personalized medicine targeting somatic alterations in osteosarcoma has become increasingly common as small-molecule inhibitors are being developed and tested in various cancers 80 .”
From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [80]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 93 · Cited by 135
- Authors
- Suehara, Y., Alex, D., Bowman, A., Middha, S., Zehir, A., Chakravarty, D., Wang, L., Jour, G., Nafa, K., Hayashi, T., Jungbluth, A. A., Frosina, D., Slotkin, E., Shukla, N., Meyers, P., Healey, J. H., Hameed, M., & Ladanyi, M.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
- 1Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
- Juntendo University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Ladanyi, Marc
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2019-11-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 6346-6356
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- PMC
- PMC6825534
- OpenAlex
- W2948356525
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 11.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NCI NIH (P30 CA008748)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15KK0353)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
- Keywords
- osteosarcoma, actionable genomic alterations, precision oncology, CDK4 amplification, MDM2 amplification, BRCA2 mutation, PTCH1 mutation, PDGFRA amplification, KIT, KDR, molecular subtypes, pediatric osteosarcoma, inclusion and exclusion criteria, OncoKB
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Chromosome Mapping, Female, Gene Amplification, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Proteins, Osteosarcoma, Genomics, Young Adult, Precision Medicine, Molecular Targeted Therapy, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review