Cited by 135Sarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments

Clinical Genomic Sequencing of Pediatric and Adult Osteosarcoma Reveals Distinct Molecular Subsets with Potentially Targetable Alterations

Open access
Suehara, Yoshiyuki, Alex, Deepu, Bowman, Anita, Middha, Sumit, Zehir, Ahmet, Chakravarty, Debyani, Wang, Lu, Jour, George +10 more·2019·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: Although multimodal chemotherapy has improved outcomes for patients with osteosarcoma, the prognosis for patients who present with metastatic and/or recurrent disease remains poor. In this study, we sought to define how often clinical genomic sequencing of osteosarcoma samples could identify potentially actionable alterations. Experimental Design: We analyzed genomic data from 71 osteosarcoma samples from 66 pediatric and adult patients sequenced using MSK-IMPACT, a hybridization capture-based large panel next-generation sequencing assay. Potentially actionable genetic events were categorized according to the OncoKB precision oncology knowledge base, of which levels 1 to 3 were considered clinically actionable. Results: We found at least one potentially actionable alteration in 14 of 66 patients (21%), including amplification of CDK4 (n = 9, 14%: level 2B) and/or MDM2 (n = 9, 14%: level 3B), and somatic truncating mutations/deletions in BRCA2 (n = 3, 5%: level 2B) and PTCH1 (n = 1, level 3B). In addition, we observed mutually exclusive patterns of alterations suggesting distinct biological subsets defined by gains at 4q12 and 6p12-21. Specifically, potentially targetable gene amplifications at 4q12 involving KIT, KDR, and PDGFRA were identified in 13 of 66 patients (20%), which showed strong PDGFRA expression by IHC. In another largely nonoverlapping subset of 14 patients (24%) with gains at 6p12-21, VEGFA amplification was identified. Conclusions: We found potentially clinically actionable alterations in approximately 21% of patients with osteosarcoma. In addition, at least 40% of patients have tumors harboring PDGFRA or VEGFA amplification, representing candidate subsets for clinical evaluation of additional therapeutic options. We propose a new genomically based algorithm for directing patients with osteosarcoma to clinical trial options.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-4032

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even the most successful molecular matching studies have identified few targetable mutations in patients with osteosarcoma.

    “Even the most successful molecular matching studies have identified few targetable mutations in patients with osteosarcoma 79,80 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [80]

  • The use of personalized medicine directed at somatic changes in osteosarcoma has grown more common alongside the development and testing of small-molecule inhibitors in other cancers.

    “Personalized medicine targeting somatic alterations in osteosarcoma has become increasingly common as small-molecule inhibitors are being developed and tested in various cancers 80 .”

    From Osteosarcoma (2022) · cites this paper as [80]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 93 · Cited by 135

Authors
Suehara, Y., Alex, D., Bowman, A., Middha, S., Zehir, A., Chakravarty, D., Wang, L., Jour, G., Nafa, K., Hayashi, T., Jungbluth, A. A., Frosina, D., Slotkin, E., Shukla, N., Meyers, P., Healey, J. H., Hameed, M., & Ladanyi, M.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
  • 1Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Juntendo University (JP)
Corresponding author
Ladanyi, Marc
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2019-11-01
Volume
25
Issue
21
Pages
6346-6356
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2948356525
Cited by
135
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NCI NIH (P30 CA008748)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15KK0353)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Keywords
osteosarcoma, actionable genomic alterations, precision oncology, CDK4 amplification, MDM2 amplification, BRCA2 mutation, PTCH1 mutation, PDGFRA amplification, KIT, KDR, molecular subtypes, pediatric osteosarcoma, inclusion and exclusion criteria, OncoKB
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Child, Chromosome Mapping, Female, Gene Amplification, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Proteins, Osteosarcoma, Genomics, Young Adult, Precision Medicine, Molecular Targeted Therapy, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review