Cited by 227Glioma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research

Genomic and phenotypic characterization of a broad panel of patient-derived xenografts reflects the diversity of glioblastoma

Open access
Vaubel, Rachael A., Tian, Shulan, Remonde, Dioval, Schroeder, Mark A., Mladek, Ann C., Kitange, Gaspar J., Caron, Alissa, Kollmeyer, Thomas M. +26 more·2020·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: Glioblastoma is the most frequent and lethal primary brain tumor. Development of novel therapies relies on the availability of relevant preclinical models. We have established a panel of 96 glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and undertaken its genomic and phenotypic characterization. Experimental Design: PDXs were established from glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (n = 93), glioblastoma, IDH-mutant (n = 2), diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant (n = 1), and both primary (n = 60) and recurrent (n = 34) tumors. Tumor growth rates, histopathology, and treatment response were characterized. Integrated molecular profiling was performed by whole-exome sequencing (WES, n = 83), RNA-sequencing (n = 68), and genome-wide methylation profiling (n = 76). WES data from 24 patient tumors was compared with derivative models. Results: PDXs recapitulate many key phenotypic and molecular features of patient tumors. Orthotopic PDXs show characteristic tumor morphology and invasion patterns, but largely lack microvascular proliferation and necrosis. PDXs capture common and rare molecular drivers, including alterations of TERT, EGFR, PTEN, TP53, BRAF, and IDH1, most at frequencies comparable with human glioblastoma. However, PDGFRA amplification was absent. RNA-sequencing and genome-wide methylation profiling demonstrated broad representation of glioblastoma molecular subtypes. MGMT promoter methylation correlated with increased survival in response to temozolomide. WES of 24 matched patient tumors showed preservation of most genetic driver alterations, including EGFR amplification. However, in four patient–PDX pairs, driver alterations were gained or lost on engraftment, consistent with clonal selection. Conclusions: Our PDX panel captures the molecular heterogeneity of glioblastoma and recapitulates many salient genetic and phenotypic features. All models and genomic data are openly available to investigators.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0909

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 227

Authors
Vaubel, R. A., Tian, S., Remonde, D., Schroeder, M. A., Mladek, A. C., Kitange, G. J., Caron, A., Kollmeyer, T. M., Grove, R., Peng, S., Carlson, B. L., Ma, D. J., Sarkar, G., Evers, L., Decker, P. A., Yan, H., Dhruv, H. D., Berens, M. E., Wang, Q., Marin, B. M., Klee, E. W., Califano, A., LaChance, D. H., Eckel-Passow, J. E., Verhaak, R. G., Sulman, E. P., Burns, T. C., Meyer, F. B., O'Neill, B. P., Tran, N. L., Giannini, C., Jenkins, R. B., Parney, I. F., & Sarkaria, J. N.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
  • Translational Genomics Research Institute (US)
  • Nanjing Medical University (CN)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • 1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Sarkaria, Jann N.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2020-03-01
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
1094-1104
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W2995968707
Cited by
227
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 13
FWCI
9.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (R35 CA197745, U01 CA217858, P50 CA108961, RO1 CA184320, U01 CA227954, R24 NS092940)
  • Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Alpha Omega Alpha Carolyn L. Kuckein Student Research Fellowship
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Keywords
glioblastoma, patient-derived xenografts, preclinical cancer models, IDH-mutant glioblastoma, recurrent glioblastoma, diffuse midline glioma, H3K27M mutation, tumor molecular subtypes, MGMT promoter methylation, temozolomide response, clonal selection, EGFR amplification, telomerase reverse transcriptase, PTEN, TP53, BRAF, PDGFRA, DNA methylation, tumor heterogeneity, tumor growth and invasion
MeSH terms
Exome Sequencing, Temozolomide, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Animals, Brain Neoplasms, Female, Genotype, Glioblastoma, Humans, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Phenotype, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Biomarkers, Tumor, DNA Modification Methylases, Survival Rate, Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating, DNA Methylation, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, DNA Repair Enzymes, Mice, Young Adult, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review