The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Development and Validation of a Gene Signature Classifier for Consensus Molecular Subtyping of Colorectal Carcinoma in a CLIA-Certified Setting
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Purpose: Consensus molecular subtyping (CMS) of colorectal cancer has potential to reshape the colorectal cancer landscape. We developed and validated an assay that is applicable on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of colorectal cancer and implemented the assay in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory. Experimental Design: We performed an in silico experiment to build an optimal CMS classifier using a training set of 1,329 samples from 12 studies and validation set of 1,329 samples from 14 studies. We constructed an assay on the basis of NanoString CodeSets for the top 472 genes, and performed analyses on paired flash-frozen (FF)/FFPE samples from 175 colorectal cancers to adapt the classifier to FFPE samples using a subset of genes found to be concordant between FF and FFPE, tested the classifier's reproducibility and repeatability, and validated in a CLIA-certified laboratory. We assessed prognostic significance of CMS in 345 patients pooled across three clinical trials. Results: The best classifier was weighted support vector machine with high accuracy across platforms and gene lists (>0.95), and the 472-gene model outperforming existing classifiers. We constructed subsets of 99 and 200 genes with high FF/FFPE concordance, and adapted FFPE-based classifier that had strong classification accuracy (>80%) relative to “gold standard” CMS. The classifier was reproducible to sample type and RNA quality, and demonstrated poor prognosis for CMS1–3 and good prognosis for CMS2 in metastatic colorectal cancer (P < 0.001). Conclusions: We developed and validated a colorectal cancer CMS assay that is ready for use in clinical trials, to assess prognosis in standard-of-care settings and explore as predictor of therapy response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A number of teams, including ours, have further developed NanoString-based classifiers (13, 22, 59).”
From Clinical Challenges of Consensus Molecular Subtype CMS4 Colon Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine (2024) · cites this paper as [59]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Morris, J. S., Luthra, R., Liu, Y., Duose, D. Y., Lee, W., Reddy, N. G., Windham, J., Chen, H., Tong, Z., Zhang, B., Wei, W., Ganiraju, M., Broom, B. M., Alvarez, H. A., Mejia, A., Veeranki, O., Routbort, M. J., Morris, V. K., Overman, M. J., Menter, D., Katkhuda, R., Wistuba, I. I., Davis, J. S., Kopetz, S., & Maru, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Nanostring Technologies (United States) (US)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- 7Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
- University of Chicago Medical Center (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2021-01-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-130
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- PMC
- PMC8713413
- OpenAlex
- W3096720134
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NCI (UH2CA207101)
- MD Anderson Cancer Center (P50 CA221707)
- NIH (CA016672)
- EMD Serono (NCT03436563)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
- Keywords
- consensus molecular subtypes, colorectal cancer, NanoString, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue, weighted support vector machine, prognostic value, metastatic colorectal cancer, treatment response prediction
- MeSH terms
- Antineoplastic Agents, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Biomarkers, Tumor, Colorectal Neoplasms, Reproducibility of Results, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Risk Assessment, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Gene Expression Profiling, Transcriptome, Support Vector Machine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review