Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

5-Year Outcomes with Cobimetinib plus Vemurafenib in BRAF V600 Mutation–Positive Advanced Melanoma: Extended Follow-up of the coBRIM Study

Open access
Ascierto, Paolo A., Dréno, Brigitte, Larkin, James, Ribas, Antoni, Liszkay, Gabriella, Maio, Michele, Mandalà, Mario, Demidov, Lev, Stroyakovskiy, Daniil, Thomas, Luc, de la Cruz-Merino, Luis, Atkinson, Victoria, Dutriaux, Caroline, Garbe, Claus, Hsu, Jessie, Jones, Surai, Li, Haocheng, McKenna, Edward, Voulgari, Athina, McArthur, Grant A.·2021·Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract

Purpose: The randomized phase III coBRIM study (NCT01689519) demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with addition of cobimetinib to vemurafenib compared with vemurafenib in patients with previously untreated BRAFV600 mutation–positive advanced melanoma. We report long-term follow-up of coBRIM, with at least 5 years since the last patient was randomized. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either oral cobimetinib (60 mg once daily on days 1–21 in each 28-day cycle) or placebo in combination with oral vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily). Results: 495 patients were randomized to cobimetinib plus vemurafenib (n = 247) or placebo plus vemurafenib (n = 248). Median follow-up was 21.2 months for cobimetinib plus vemurafenib and 16.6 months for placebo plus vemurafenib. Median OS was 22.5 months (95% CI, 20.3–28.8) with cobimetinib plus vemurafenib and 17.4 months (95% CI, 15.0–19.8) with placebo plus vemurafenib; 5-year OS rates were 31% and 26%, respectively. Median PFS was 12.6 months (95% CI, 9.5–14.8) with cobimetinib plus vemurafenib and 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.6–7.5) with placebo plus vemurafenib; 5-year PFS rates were 14% and 10%, respectively. OS and PFS were longest in patients with normal baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels and low tumor burden, and in those achieving complete response. The safety profile remained consistent with previously published reports. Conclusions: Extended follow-up of coBRIM confirms the long-term clinical benefit and safety profile of cobimetinib plus vemurafenib compared with vemurafenib monotherapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutation–positive advanced melanoma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0809

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Ascierto, P. A., Dréno, B., Larkin, J., Ribas, A., Liszkay, G., Maio, M., Mandalà, M., Demidov, L., Stroyakovskiy, D., Thomas, L., de la Cruz-Merino, L., Atkinson, V., Dutriaux, C., Garbe, C., Hsu, J., Jones, S., Li, H., McKenna, E., Voulgari, A., & McArthur, G. A.
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2021-06-22
Volume
27
Issue
19
Pages
5225-5235
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W3173401695
Cited by
191
References
2
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 5-Year Outcomes with Cobimetinib plus Vemurafenib in BRAF V600 Mutation–Positive Advanced Melanoma: Extended Follow-up of the coBRIM Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0809
The paper
Ascierto, P. A., Dréno, B., Larkin, J., Ribas, A., Liszkay, G., Maio, M., Mandalà, M., Demidov, L., Stroyakovskiy, D., Thomas, L., de la Cruz-Merino, L., Atkinson, V., Dutriaux, C., Garbe, C., Hsu, J., Jones, S., Li, H., McKenna, E., Voulgari, A., & McArthur, G. A. (2021). 5-Year Outcomes with Cobimetinib plus Vemurafenib in BRAF V600 Mutation–Positive Advanced Melanoma: Extended Follow-up of the coBRIM Study. Clinical Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-0809

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.