Comparative Analysis and Isoform-Specific Therapeutic Vulnerabilities of KRAS Mutations in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Purpose: Activating missense mutations of KRAS are the most frequent oncogenic driver events in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, KRAS isoforms are highly heterogeneous, and data on the potential isoform-dependent therapeutic vulnerabilities are still lacking. Experimental Design: We developed an isogenic cell-based platform to compare the oncogenic properties and specific therapeutic actionability of KRAS-mutant isoforms. In parallel, we analyzed clinicopathologic and genomic data from 3,560 patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to survey allele-specific features associated with oncogenic KRAS mutations. Results: In isogenic cell lines expressing different mutant KRAS isoforms, we identified isoform-specific biochemical, biological, and oncogenic properties both in vitro and in vivo. These exclusive features correlated with different therapeutic responses to MEK inhibitors, with KRAS G12C and Q61H mutants being more sensitive compared with other isoforms. In vivo, combined KRAS G12C and MEK inhibition was more effective than either drug alone. Among patients with NSCLCs that underwent comprehensive tumor genomic profiling, STK11 and ATM mutations were significantly enriched among tumors harboring KRAS G12C, G12A, and G12V mutations. KEAP1 mutation was significantly enriched among KRAS G12C and KRAS G13X LUADs. KRAS G13X-mutated tumors had the highest frequency of concurrent STK11 and KEAP1 mutations. Transcriptomic profiling revealed unique patterns of gene expression in each KRAS isoform, compared with KRAS wild-type tumors. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that KRAS isoforms are highly heterogeneous in terms of concurrent genomic alterations and gene-expression profiles, and that stratification based on KRAS alleles should be considered in the design of future clinical trials.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Co-mutation of KEAP1/STK11 was more common in patients with KRASG13-mutated lung cancer than in patients with KRASG12D-mutated lung cancer, and co-mutation of KEAP1/STK11 with KRASG13 was associated with poor prognosis and treatment resistance.
“For example, co-mutation of KEAP1/STK11 was more common in patients with KRASG13-mutated lung cancer than in patients with KRASG12D-mutated lung cancer, and co-mutation of KEAP1/STK11 with KRASG13 was associated with poor prognosis and treatment resistance28.”
From Impact of KRAS mutations and co-mutations on clinical outcomes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 42
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [16]Tang R, Shuldiner EG, Kelly M, Murray CW, Hebert JD, Andrejka L, Multiplexed identification of RAS paralog imbalance as a driver of lung cancer growth. bioRxiv. 2021;
- Authors
- Ricciuti, B., Son, J., Okoro, J. J., Mira, A., Patrucco, E., Eum, Y., Wang, X., Paranal, R., Wang, H., Lin, M., Haikala, H. M., Li, J., Xu, Y., Alessi, J. V., Chhoeu, C., Redig, A. J., Köhler, J., Dholakia, K. H., Chen, Y., Richard, E., Nokin, M.-J., Santamaria, D., Gokhale, P. C., Awad, M. M., Jänne, P. A., & Ambrogio, C.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Turin (IT)
- Tongji University (CN)
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- 8Institut Bergonié, INSERM U1218, ACTION Laboratory, Bordeaux, France.
- Inserm (FR)
- 9University of Bordeaux, INSERM U1218, ACTION Laboratory, IECB, Pessac, France.
- 1Lowe Center for Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Published
- 2022-01-28
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1640-1650
- ISSN
- 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3265
- PMC
- PMC10979418
- OpenAlex
- W4210784540
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (101001288)
- AIRC (IG 2021, 25737)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- KRAS mutation, non-small cell lung cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, MEK inhibitors, KRAS G12C, KRAS G12V, isogenic cell lines, STK11, Keap1, ATM, gene expression profiling, combination therapy
- MeSH terms
- Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mutation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Protein Isoforms, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, NF-E2-Related Factor 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review