Cited by 287Advanced Breast Cancer TherapiesBreast Cancer Treatment StudiesPARP inhibition in cancer therapy

Updated Overall Survival of Ribociclib plus Endocrine Therapy versus Endocrine Therapy Alone in Pre- and Perimenopausal Patients with HR+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer in MONALEESA-7: A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Lu, Yen-Shen, Im, Seock-Ah, Colleoni, Marco, Franke, Fabio, Bardia, Aditya, Cardoso, Fatima, Harbeck, Nadia, Hurvitz, Sara +20 more·2022·Clinical Cancer Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Purpose: Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) demonstrated a statistically significant progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) benefit in the phase III MONALEESA-7 trial of pre-/perimenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). The median OS was not reached in the ribociclib arm in the protocol-specified final analysis; we hence performed an exploratory OS and additional outcomes analysis with an extended follow-up (median, 53.5 months). Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized to receive ET [goserelin plus nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) or tamoxifen] with ribociclib or placebo. OS was evaluated with a stratified Cox proportional hazard model and summarized with Kaplan–Meier methods. Results: The intent-to-treat population included 672 patients. Median OS was 58.7 months with ribociclib versus 48.0 months with placebo [hazard ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61–0.96]. Kaplan–Meier estimated OS at 48 months was 60% and 50% with ribociclib and placebo, respectively. Subgroup analyses were generally consistent with the OS benefit, including patients who received NSAI and patients aged less than 40 years. Subsequent antineoplastic therapies following discontinuation were balanced between the ribociclib (77%) and placebo (78%) groups. Use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors after discontinuation was higher with placebo (26%) versus ribociclib (13%). Time to first chemotherapy was significantly delayed with ribociclib versus placebo. No drug–drug interactions were observed between ribociclib and either NSAI. Conclusions: Ribociclib plus ET continued to show significantly longer OS than ET alone in pre-/perimenopausal patients, including patients aged less than 40 years, with HR+/HER2− ABC with 53.5 months of median follow-up (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02278120).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3032

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In MONALEESA-7, a significant overall survival benefit was observed with first-line ribociclib + NSAI versus NSAI alone in pre/perimenopausal women, with median overall survival not reached vs 40.7 months (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50-0.98); an exploratory extended follow-up reported median overall survival 58.7 vs 47.7 months (HR 0.798; 95% CI 0.62-1.04).

    “In MONALEESA-7, a significant OS benefit was observed with first-line ribociclib + NSAI versus NSAI alone (mOS, not reached [NR] vs. 40.7 months [HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50–0.98]) in pre/perimenopausal women; in addition, an exploratory analysis with extended follow-up reported an mOS of 58.7 versus 47.7 for ribociclib + NSAI versus NSAI alone (HR 0.798; 95% CI 0.62–1.04) [15, 16].”

    From Updated overall survival from the MONALEESA-3 trial in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving first-line ribociclib plus fulvestrant. (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This is the third pivotal trial to demonstrate a significant improvement in overall survival with ribociclib in a first-line setting.

    “This is the third pivotal trial to demonstrate a significant improvement in OS with ribociclib in a first-line setting”

    From Updated overall survival from the MONALEESA-3 trial in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving first-line ribociclib plus fulvestrant. (2023) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Introduction and Discussion report a significant overall-survival benefit with first-line ribociclib in MONALEESA-7. They do not establish that the trial described in the citing sentence was the third pivotal trial to show this benefit; the Discussion instead describes MONALEESA-7 as the first CDK4/6-inhibitor trial to demonstrate a statistically significant overall-survival benefit. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [1]Tripathy D, Im S-A, Colleoni M, Franke F, Bardia A, Harbeck N, Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: 904– 15. 29804902
  2. [4]Tripathy D, Bardia A, Sellers WR. Ribociclib (LEE011): mechanism of action and clinical impact of this selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor in various solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23: 3251– 62. 28351928 PMC5727901
  3. [6]Azim HA Jr, Partridge AH. Biology of breast cancer in young women. Breast Cancer Res 2014; 16: 427. 25436920 PMC4303229
  4. [8]Robins JM, Tsiatis AA. Correcting for non-compliance in randomized trials using rank preserving structural failure time models. Commun Stat Theory Methods 1991; 20: 2609– 31.
  5. [9]Infante JR, Cassier PA, Gerecitano JF, Witteveen PO, Chugh R, Ribrag V, A phase I study of the cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor ribociclib (LEE011) in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphomas. Clin Cancer Res 2016; 22: 5696– 705. 27542767 PMC5621377
  6. [10]Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, Fasching PA, De Laurentiis M, Im S-A, Overall survival with ribociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 514– 24. 31826360
  7. [12]Bardia A, Hurvitz S. Targeted therapy for premenopausal women with HR(+), HER2(-) advanced breast cancer: focus on special considerations and latest advances. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24: 5206– 18. 29884743
  8. [14]Prat A, Brase JC, Cheng Y, Nuciforo P, Paré L, Pascual T, Everolimus plus exemestane for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: a PAM50 intrinsic subtype analysis of BOLERO-2. Oncologist 2019; 24: 893– 900. 30679318 PMC6656445
  9. [15]Prat A, Cheang MCU, Galván P, Nuciforo P, Paré L, Adamo B, Prognostic value of intrinsic subtypes in hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer treated with letrozole with or without lapatinib. JAMA Oncol 2016; 2: 1287– 94. 27281556
  10. [16]Prat A, Chaudhury A, Solovieff N, Paré L, Martinez D, Chic N, Correlative biomarker analysis of intrinsic subtypes and efficacy across the MONALEESA phase III studies. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39: 1458– 67. 33769862 PMC8196091
  11. [17]Harbeck N, Franke F, Villanueva-Vazquez R, Lu Y-S, Tripathy D, Chow L, Health-related quality of life in premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer treated with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy: results from a phase III randomized clinical trial (MONALEESA-7). Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12: 1758835920943065. 32782490 PMC7385843
  12. [18]Cardoso F, Spence D, Mertz S, Corneliussen-James D, Sabelko K, Gralow J, Global analysis of advanced/metastatic breast cancer: decade report (2005–2015). Breast 2018; 39: 131– 8. 29679849

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, Y.-S., Im, S.-A., Colleoni, M., Franke, F., Bardia, A., Cardoso, F., Harbeck, N., Hurvitz, S., Chow, L., Sohn, J., Lee, K. S., Campos-Gomez, S., Villanueva Vazquez, R., Jung, K. H., Babu, K. G., Wheatley-Price, P., De Laurentiis, M., Im, Y.-H., Kuemmel, S., El-Saghir, N., O'Regan, R., Gasch, C., Solovieff, N., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Chakravartty, A., Ji, Y., & Tripathy, D.
Affiliations
  • National Taiwan University (TW)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • European Institute of Oncology (IT)
  • 4Hospital de Caridade de Ijuí, CACON, Ijuí, Brazil.
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Champalimaud Foundation (PT)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • 9Organisation for Oncology and Translational Research, Hong Kong.
  • Severance Hospital (KR)
  • National Cancer Center (KR)
  • 12Centro Oncológico Estatal, Instituto de Seguridad Social del Estado de México y Municipios, Toluca, Mexico.
  • 13Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Moisès Broggi, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology (IN)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • 17Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • Kliniken Essen-Mitte (DE)
  • American University of Beirut Medical Center (LB)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • 23Novartis Ireland Limited, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • 26Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey.
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lu, Yen-Shen
Venue
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2021-12-27
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
851-859
ISSN
  • 1078-0432 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-3265
OpenAlex
W4200069316
Cited by
287
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 16
FWCI
23.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Cancer Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • YUHSpace (Yonsei University Medical Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Keywords
ribociclib, endocrine therapy, hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer, advanced breast cancer, premenopausal women, overall survival, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, goserelin, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors, tamoxifen, drug-drug interactions
MeSH terms
Aminopyridines, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Purines, Receptors, Estrogen, Receptor, ErbB-2, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Aromatase Inhibitors, Perimenopause

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review