The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
G2 checkpoint abrogators as anticancer drugs
Abstract
Many conventional anticancer treatments kill cells irrespective of whether they are normal or cancerous, so patients suffer from adverse side effects due to the loss of healthy cells. Anticancer insights derived from cell cycle research has given birth to the idea of cell cycle G2 checkpoint abrogation as a cancer cell specific therapy, based on the discovery that many cancer cells have a defective G1 checkpoint resulting in a dependence on the G2 checkpoint during cell replication. Damaged DNA in humans is detected by sensor proteins (such as hHUS1, hRAD1, hRAD9, hRAD17, and hRAD26) that transmit a signal via ATR to CHK1, or by another sensor complex (that may include γH2AX, 53BP1, BRCA1, NBS1, hMRE11, and hRAD50), the signal of which is relayed by ATM to CHK2. Most of the damage signals originated by the sensor complexes for the G2 checkpoint are conducted to CDC25C, the activity of which is modulated by 14-3-3. There are also less extensively explored pathways involving p53, p38, PCNA, HDAC, PP2A, PLK1, WEE1, CDC25B, and CDC25A. This review will examine the available inhibitors of CHK1 (Staurosporin, UCN-01, Go6976, SB-218078, ICP-1, and CEP-3891), both CHK1 and CHK2 (TAT-S216A and debromohymenialdisine), CHK2 (CEP-6367), WEE1 (PD0166285), and PP2A (okadaic acid and fostriecin), as well as the unknown checkpoint inhibitors 13-hydroxy-15-ozoapathin and the isogranulatimides. Among these targets, CHK1 seems to be the most suitable target for therapeutic G2 abrogation to date, although an unexplored target such as 14-3-3 or the strategy of targeting multiple proteins at once may be of interest in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division
Levine, A. J. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81871-1 · Cited by 7,693
Sherr, C. J. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5293.1672 · Cited by 5,379
Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases
Abraham, R. T. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.914401 · Cited by 1,966
Liu, Q., Guntuku, S., Cui, X.-S., Matsuoka, S., Cortez, D., Tamai, K., Luo, G., Carattini-Rivera, S., DeMayo, F., Bradley, A., et al. (2000) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.14.12.1448 · Cited by 1,625
Regulation of the G2/M transition by p53
Taylor, W. R., & Stark, G. R. (2001) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204252 · Cited by 1,559
Peng, C.-Y., Graves, P. R., Thoma, R. S., Wu, Z., Shaw, A. S., & Piwnica-Worms, H. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5331.1501 · Cited by 1,341
Linkage of ATM to Cell Cycle Regulation by the Chk2 Protein Kinase
Matsuoka, S. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5395.1893 · Cited by 1,322
Sanchez, Y., Wong, C., Thoma, R. S., Richman, R., Wu, Z., Piwnica-Worms, H., & Elledge, S. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5331.1497 · Cited by 1,320
DNA Damage-Induced Activation of p53 by the Checkpoint Kinase Chk2
Hirao, A., Kong, Y.-Y., Matsuoka, S., Wakeham, A., Ruland, J., Yoshida, H., Liu, D., Elledge, S. J., & Mak, T. W. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5459.1824 · Cited by 1,285
Is a p53-Regulated Inhibitor of G2/M Progression
Hermeking, H., Lengauer, C., Polyak, K., He, T.-C., Zhang, L., Thiagalingam, S., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1997) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80002-7 · Cited by 1,251
Cited by
Radiation-induced cell death mechanisms
Eriksson, D., & Stigbrand, T. (2010) · Tumor Biology · doi:10.1007/s13277-010-0042-8 · Cited by 666
Hirai, H., Iwasawa, Y., Okada, M., Arai, T., Nishibata, T., Kobayashi, M., Kimura, T., Kaneko, N., Ohtani, J., Yamanaka, K., et al. (2009) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-09-0463 · Cited by 540
G2 checkpoint abrogation and checkpoint kinase-1 targeting in the treatment of cancer
Bucher, N., & Britten, C. D. (2008) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6604208 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Kawabe, T.
- Venue
- Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
- Published
- 2004-04-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 513-519
- ISSN
- 1535-7163 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-8514
- OpenAlex
- W1840165714
- Cited by
- 377
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 10.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: G2 checkpoint abrogators as anticancer drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/1535-7163.513.3.4
- The paper
- Kawabe, T. (2004). G2 checkpoint abrogators as anticancer drugs. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.513.3.4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.