Cited by 168

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Activity of GRN1005, a Novel Conjugate of Angiopep-2, a Peptide Facilitating Brain Penetration, and Paclitaxel, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Kurzrock, Razelle, Gabrail, Nash, Chandhasin, Chandtip, Moulder, Stacy, Smith, Carrie, Brenner, Andrew, Sankhala, Kamalesh, Mita, Alain, Elian, Kelly, Bouchard, Danielle, Sarantopoulos, John·2012·Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

Abstract

GRN1005 is a novel peptide–drug conjugate composed of paclitaxel covalently linked to a peptide, angiopep-2, that targets the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1. This first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of GRN1005 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients in sequential cohorts (one patient per cohort until grade 2 toxicity, then 3 + 3 design) received intravenous GRN1005 at escalating doses between 30 and 700 mg/m2 once in every 21 days. In the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) expansion group, patients were required to have brain metastases. Fifty-six patients received GRN1005, including 41 with brain metastases (median number of prior therapies = 4). MTD was 650 mg/m2; the main dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. Sixteen of 20 patients dosed at the MTD had brain metastases. Pharmacokinetics was dose linear and the mean terminal-phase elimination half-life was 3.6 hours. No evidence of accumulation was observed after repeat dosing. No anti-GRN1005 antibodies were detected. Five of the 20 patients (25%) dosed at 650 mg/m2 (MTD), three of whom had previous taxane therapy, achieved an overall partial response (breast, n = 2; non–small cell lung cancer, n = 2; and ovarian cancer, n = 1); responses in all five patients were also accompanied by shrinkage of brain lesions (−17% to −50%). In addition, six patients (11%; doses 30–700 mg/m2) experienced stable disease that lasted 4 months or more. GRN1005 was well tolerated and showed activity in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors, including those who had brain metastases and/or failed prior taxane therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(2); 308–16. ©2011 AACR.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-11-0566

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Walbert, 2009, The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with brain metastases from solid tumors, Int J Clin Oncol, 14, 299, 10.1007/s10147-009-0916-1 · DOI
  2. Eichler, 2007, Multidisciplinary management of brain metastases, Oncologist, 12, 884, 10.1634/theoncologist.12-7-884 · DOI
  3. Gerstner, 2007, Increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier to chemotherapy in metastatic brain tumors: establishing a treatment paradigm, J Clin Oncol, 25, 2306, 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.0677 · DOI
  4. Mehta, 2010, The role of chemotherapy in the management of newly diagnosed brain metastases: a systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline, J Neurooncol, 96, 71, 10.1007/s11060-009-0062-7 · DOI
  5. Platta, 2010, Current treatment strategies for brain metastasis and complications from therapeutic techniques: a review of current literature, Am J Clin Oncol, 33, 398, 10.1097/COC.0b013e318194f744 · DOI
  6. Regina, 2008, Antitumour activity of ANG1005, a conjugate between paclitaxel and the new brain delivery vector Angiopep-2, Br J Pharmacol, 155, 185, 10.1038/bjp.2008.260 · DOI
  7. Gelderblom, 2001, Cremophor EL: the drawbacks and advantages of vehicle selection for drug formulation, Eur J Cancer, 37, 1590, 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00171-X · DOI
  8. Thomas, 2009, Uptake of ANG1005, a novel paclitaxel derivative, through the blood-brain barrier into brain and experimental brain metastases of breast cancer, Pharm Res, 26, 2486, 10.1007/s11095-009-9964-5 · DOI
  9. Fellner, 2002, Transport of paclitaxel (Taxol) across the blood-brain barrier in vitro and in vivo, J Clin Invest, 110, 1309, 10.1172/JCI0215451 · DOI
  10. Heimans, 1994, Paclitaxel (Taxol) concentrations in brain tumor tissue, Ann Oncol, 5, 951, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058736 · DOI
  11. Simon, 1997, Accelerated titration designs for phase I clinical trials in oncology, J Natl Cancer Inst, 89, 1138, 10.1093/jnci/89.15.1138 · DOI
  12. Meyers, 2006, Role and relevance of neurocognitive assessment in clinical trials of patients with CNS tumors, J Clin Oncol, 24, 1305, 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.6086 · DOI
  13. Meyers, 2004, Neurocognitive function and progression in patients with brain metastases treated with whole-brain radiation and motexafin gadolinium: results of a randomized phase III trial, J Clin Oncol, 22, 157, 10.1200/JCO.2004.05.128 · DOI
  14. Mire-Sluis, 2004, Recommendations for the design and optimization of immunoassays used in the detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products, J Immunol Methods, 289, 1, 10.1016/j.jim.2004.06.002 · DOI
  15. Therasse, 2000, New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada, J Natl Cancer Inst, 92, 205, 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Sparreboom, 2005, Comparative preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetics of a cremophor-free, nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (ABI-007) and paclitaxel formulated in Cremophor (Taxol), Clin Cancer Res, 11, 4136, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2291 · DOI
  17. Wen, 2010, Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group, J Clin Oncol, 28, 1963, 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541 · DOI
  18. van den Bent, 2011, Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas, Lancet Oncol, 12, 583, 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70057-2 · DOI
  19. Song, 2009, Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 promotes cancer cell migration and invasion by inducing the expression of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9, Cancer Res, 69, 879, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3379 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 168

Metadata

Authors
Kurzrock, R., Gabrail, N., Chandhasin, C., Moulder, S., Smith, C., Brenner, A., Sankhala, K., Mita, A., Elian, K., Bouchard, D., & Sarantopoulos, J.
Affiliations
Authors' Affiliations: Departments of 1Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Program) and 2Breast Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; 3Institute for Drug Development, Cancer Therapy and Research Center at University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; 4Gabrail Cancer Center, Canton, Ohio; and 5Angiochem Inc., Montreal, Québec, Canada
Venue
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Published
2012-02-01
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
308-316
ISSN
  • 1535-7163
  • 1538-8514
Cited by
168
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review