Cited by 34Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Combining Erlotinib and Cetuximab Is Associated with Activity in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (Including Squamous Cell Carcinomas) and Wild-Type EGFR or Resistant Mutations

Open access
Wheler, Jennifer J., Tsimberidou, Apostolia M., Falchook, Gerald S., Zinner, Ralph G., Hong, David S., Fok, Jansina Y., Fu, Siqing, Piha-Paul, Sarina A. +2 more·2013·Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

Abstract

Preclinical data suggest that combined EGF receptor (EGFR) targeting with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor and an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody may be superior over single-agent targeting. Therefore, as part of a phase I study, we analyzed the outcome of 20 patients with non–small cell lung cancer treated with the combination of erlotinib and cetuximab. EGFR mutation status was ascertained in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment–approved laboratory. There were 10 men; median number of prior therapies was five. Overall, two of 20 patients (10%) achieved partial response (PR), one of whom had a TKI-resistant EGFR insertion in exon 20, time to treatment failure (TTF) = 24+ months, and the other patient had squamous cell histology (EGFR wild-type), TTF = 7.4 months. In addition, three of 20 patients (15%) achieved stable disease (SD) ≥6 six months (one of whom had wild-type EGFR and squamous cell histology, and two patients had an EGFR TKI-sensitive mutation, one of whom had failed prior erlotinib therapy). Combination therapy with ertotinib plus cetuximab was well tolerated. The most common toxicities were rash, diarrhea, and hypomagnesemia. The recommended phase II dose was erlotinib 150 mg oral daily and cetuximab 250 mg/m2 i.v. weekly. In summary, erlotinib and cetuximab treatment was associated with SD ≥ six months/PR in five of 20 patients with non–small cell lung cancer (25%), including individuals with squamous histology, TKI-resistant EGFR mutations, and wild-type EGFR, and those who had progressed on prior erlotinib after an initial response. This combination warrants further study in select populations of non–small cell lung cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 12(10); 2167–75. ©2013 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-12-1208

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In previously published clinical studies, patients with only a single amino acid insertion responded better to already-established therapies, such as erlotinib plus cetuximab or irreversible inhibitors, compared to patients with larger insertions comprised of three amino acids.

    “In previously published clinical studies, patients with only a single amino acid insertion responded better to already-established therapies, such as erlotinib plus cetuximab or irreversible inhibitors, compared to patients with larger insertions comprised of three amino acids48,49,50.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 34

Authors
Wheler, J. J., Tsimberidou, A. M., Falchook, G. S., Zinner, R. G., Hong, D. S., Fok, J. Y., Fu, S., Piha-Paul, S. A., Naing, A., & Kurzrock, R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Wheler, Jennifer J.
Venue
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Published
2013-10-01
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
2167-2175
ISSN
  • 1535-7163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-8514
OpenAlex
W2129714975
Cited by
34
References
44
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA016672)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
erlotinib, cetuximab, non-small cell lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, EGFR exon 20 insertion, EGFR wild-type, combination therapy, anti-EGFR therapy, treatment toxicity, time to treatment failure
MeSH terms
Cetuximab, Erlotinib Hydrochloride, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Neoplasm Staging, Quinazolines, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review