Efficacy of the MDM2 inhibitor SAR405838 in glioblastoma is limited by poor distribution across the blood-brain barrier
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Controversy exists surrounding whether heterogeneous disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), as seen in glioblastoma (GBM), leads to adequate drug delivery sufficient for efficacy in GBM. This question is especially important when using potent, targeted agents that have a poor penetration across an intact BBB. Efficacy of the murine double minute-2 (MDM2) inhibitor SAR405838 was tested in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of GBM. In vitro efficacy of SAR405838 was evaluated in PDX models with varying MDM2 expression and those with high (GBM108) and low (GBM102) expression were evaluated for flank and orthotopic efficacy. BBB permeability, evaluated using TexasRed-3 kDa dextran, was significantly increased in GBM108 through VEGFA overexpression. Drug delivery, MRI, and orthotopic survival were compared between BBB-intact (GBM108-vector) and BBB-disrupted (GBM108-VEGFA) models. MDM2-amplified PDX lines with high MDM2 expression were sensitive to SAR405838 in comparison with MDM2 control lines in both in vitro and heterotopic models. In contrast with profound efficacy observed in flank xenografts, SAR405838 was ineffective in orthotopic tumors. Although both GBM108-vector and GBM108-VEGFA readily imaged on MRI following gadolinium contrast administration, GBM108-VEGFA tumors had a significantly enhanced drug and gadolinium accumulation, as determined by MALDI-MSI. Enhanced drug delivery in GBM108-VEGFA translated into a marked improvement in orthotopic efficacy. This study clearly shows that limited drug distribution across a partially intact BBB may limit the efficacy of targeted agents in GBM. Brain penetration of targeted agents is a critical consideration in any precision medicine strategy for GBM. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(9); 1893–901. ©2018 AACR.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple MDM2 inhibitors have significant efficacy in GBM preclinical models and have entered early-phase clinical trials in GBM.
“Multiple MDM2 inhibitors have significant efficacy in GBM preclinical models (7, 8, 10, 11) and have entered early-phase clinical trials in GBM.”
From Preclinical Modeling of Navtemadlin Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy in IDH–Wild-type Glioblastoma (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports preclinical GBM activity for SAR405838 and cites a GBM study of another MDM2 inhibitor, RG7112. It says several MDM2 inhibitors were in phase I trials for solid tumors, but does not establish that multiple inhibitors had entered trials specifically in GBM. The paper also limits SAR405838’s intracranial efficacy because of poor drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSAR405838, RG7112, and idasanutlin have shown efficacy in GBM preclinical models.
“Several MDM2 inhibitors have shown efficacy in GBM preclinical models, including SAR405838 (7), RG7112 (8), idasanutlin (RG7388; ref. 9)”
From Preclinical Modeling of Navtemadlin Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy in IDH–Wild-type Glioblastoma (2025) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Kim, M., Ma, D. J., Calligaris, D., Zhang, S., Feathers, R. W., Vaubel, R. A., Meaux, I., Mladek, A. C., Parrish, K. E., Jin, F., Barriere, C., Debussche, L., Watters, J., Tian, S., Decker, P. A., Eckel-Passow, J. E., Kitange, G. J., Johnson, A. J., Parney, I. F., Anastasiadis, P. Z., Agar, N. Y. R., Elmquist, W. F., & Sarkaria, J. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
- Sanofi (France) (FR)
- 6Sanofi Oncology, Vitry-sur-Seine, France.
- 2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
- Corresponding author
- Sarkaria, Jann N.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
- Published
- 2018-09-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1893-1901
- ISSN
- 1535-7163 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-8514
- PMC
- PMC6125211
- OpenAlex
- W2811177858
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (CA90628, CA138437, NS077921, CA186976, CA108961)
- MIT/Mayo Physical Sciences Center (U54CA210180)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Keywords
- glioblastoma, MDM2 inhibitors, blood-brain barrier permeability, drug delivery, patient-derived xenografts, VEGF-A, MDM2 amplification, orthotopic tumor model, gadolinium-enhanced MRI, MALDI mass spectrometry imaging, targeted therapy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Brain Neoplasms, Female, Glioblastoma, Humans, Indoles, Male, Spiro Compounds, Survival Analysis, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Treatment Outcome, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Mice, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review