Response and Resistance to Paradox-Breaking BRAF Inhibitor in Melanomas In Vivo and Ex Vivo
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
FDA-approved BRAF inhibitors produce high response rates and improve overall survival in patients with BRAF V600E/K–mutant melanoma, but are linked to pathologies associated with paradoxical ERK1/2 activation in wild-type BRAF cells. To overcome this limitation, a next-generation paradox-breaking RAF inhibitor (PLX8394) has been designed. Here, we show that by using a quantitative reporter assay, PLX8394 rapidly suppressed ERK1/2 reporter activity and growth of mutant BRAF melanoma xenografts. Ex vivo treatment of xenografts and use of a patient-derived explant system (PDeX) revealed that PLX8394 suppressed ERK1/2 signaling and elicited apoptosis more effectively than the FDA-approved BRAF inhibitor, vemurafenib. Furthermore, PLX8394 was efficacious against vemurafenib-resistant BRAF splice variant–expressing tumors and reduced splice variant homodimerization. Importantly, PLX8394 did not induce paradoxical activation of ERK1/2 in wild-type BRAF cell lines or PDeX. Continued in vivo dosing of xenografts with PLX8394 led to the development of acquired resistance via ERK1/2 reactivation through heterogeneous mechanisms; however, resistant cells were found to have differential sensitivity to ERK1/2 inhibitor. These findings highlight the efficacy of a paradox-breaking selective BRAF inhibitor and the use of PDeX system to test the efficacy of therapeutic agents. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(1); 84–95. ©2017 AACR.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FASN upregulation has also been observed in melanoma following the development of resistance to PLX8394 in vivo.
“Notably, FASN upregulation has also been observed in melanoma following the development of resistance to PLX8394 in vivo [9].”
From Inhibition of fatty acid synthase enhances therapeutic efficacy and delays acquired resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
The Results section reports that melanoma xenografts developed resistance during PLX8394 treatment in vivo. Its analysis of resistant cells describes changes in ERK1/2, AKT, PDGFR and β-catenin, but does not report FASN upregulation (searched: FASN, fatty acid synthase). Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredProlonged use of plixorafenib can lead to acquired resistance.
“Although plixorafenib is more effective than first-generation BRAF inhibitors, prolonged use can lead to acquired resistance [9].”
From Inhibition of fatty acid synthase enhances therapeutic efficacy and delays acquired resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Melanoma cells resistant to PLX8394 display elevated Rb phosphorylation compared to parental cells.
“Notably, melanoma cells resistant to PLX8394 also display elevated Rb phosphorylation compared to parental cells [9]”
From Inhibition of fatty acid synthase enhances therapeutic efficacy and delays acquired resistance to BRAF-targeted therapy in colorectal cancer (2026) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 27
- Authors
- Hartsough, E. J., Kugel, C. H., Vido, M. J., Berger, A. C., Purwin, T. J., Goldberg, A., Davies, M. A., Schiewer, M. J., Knudsen, K. E., Bollag, G., & Aplin, A. E.
- Affiliations
- Thomas Jefferson University (US)
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
- Plexxikon (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aplin, Andrew E.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
- Published
- 2018-01-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-95
- ISSN
- 1535-7163 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-8514
- PMC
- PMC5752590
- OpenAlex
- W2769245281
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Center (CA207855, CA203314, CA182635 and CA196278)
- NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (CA16672)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
- Keywords
- BRAF inhibitors, melanoma, BRAF V600E/K mutation, ERK signaling, vemurafenib resistance, xenografts, acquired drug resistance, apoptosis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Female, Humans, Melanoma, Mice, Nude, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review