Cited by 1Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis

Abstract 3616: Validation and fitness testing of a quantitative immunoassay for HIF1α in biopsy specimens

Park, Sook Ryun, Kinders, Robert J., Khin, Sonny, Hollingshead, Melinda, Parchment, Ralph E., Tomaszewski, Joseph E., Doroshow, James H.·2012·Cancer Research

Abstract

HIF1α is an important marker of hypoxia in human tumors that is altered in a number of cancers, but a reproducible method to determine changes in HIF1α protein expression in human tumor biopsy specimens has not been available. While HIF1α is being used as a pharmacodynamic marker in clinical trials in the NCI (CTEP# 8610, 8856, 8880), an important limitation in measuring the change in HIF1α induced by cancer therapeutic agents is the lability of the protein, in the presence of oxygen, upon collection of the sample. We have devised a method of specimen collection, handling, and extraction that preserves and stabilizes HIF1α levels in tumor biopsies. Degassed collection buffer yielded a significant increase of recovered HIF1α levels compared to the standard method of flash-freezing. The addition of 2-hydroxyglutarate, an inhibitor of prolyl hydroxylase domain enzyme that is involved in the degradation pathway of HIF1α under normoxic conditions, to the collection buffer showed a trend for improved yield of the HIF1α recovery. Sonication and homogenization with ceramic beads were superior to homogenization with metallic beads or tissue grinding. Employing this specimen-handling method allowed validation of a two-site immunoassay for HIF1α quantitation in solid-tissue extracts generated from tumor biopsies. Intra-assay variability was less than 10%, and inter-assay variability was less than 20%. Accuracy, assessed by spike recovery, was 99 +/− 7%. HIF1α readings declined linearly…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-3616

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, S. R., Kinders, R. J., Khin, S., Hollingshead, M., Parchment, R. E., Tomaszewski, J. E., & Doroshow, J. H.
Affiliations
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Science Applications International Corporation (United States) (US)
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2012-04
Volume
72
Issue
8_Supplement
Pages
3616-3616
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2088536642
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2013: 1
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Keywords
HIF-1α, hypoxia, quantitative immunoassay, sample stabilization, 2-hydroxyglutarate, prolyl hydroxylase inhibition, tissue homogenization, pharmacodynamic biomarkers, topotecan, xenograft models, prostate cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review