The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abstract 165: Enhanced processing of genomic sequencing data for pediatric cancers: GPUs and machine learning techniques for variant detection
Abstract
Introduction: The evolution of precision oncology will demand the integration of multi-omics, clinical data, demographics and outcomes, which is a complex and computationally intensive endeavor. Accurate and robust molecular characterization of pediatric leukemias require a comprehensive approach involving longitudinal sample collection across a large cohort. Genomic alterations, both germline and somatic, need to be efficiently captured and annotated to identify clinically meaningful trends. Algorithms developed for conducting genomic analysis typically leverage a central processing unit (CPU) environment for data processing and traditional statistical approach, such as Bayes' theorem, for variant detection. More recently, algorithms have been developed that can leverage a graphics processing unit (GPU) architecture and machine learning (ML) technology. In this study we benchmarked these techniques and applied them sequencing data generated from pediatric AML subjects enrolled on the Children's Oncology Group AAML1031 trial (951 samples). Methods: Whole genome sequencing was conducted using the Illumina platform (2X150) and sequenced between 30x-60x coverage. Genome alignment files were generated and subjected to germline and somatic variant calling (NVIDIA's Selene DGXA100 cluster; Parabricks Pipelines). Germline variants were called using Haplotype caller and DeepVariant (Parabricks v3.0). HG002 genome in a bottle sample was used as a positive control to determine precision, recall and F1 score. Somatic variant calling was completed using somatic sniper, VarScan2, Muse, MuTect2, and Strelka (Parabricks v3.5) and SEQCII data was used to assess somatic variant calling performance. Results: Control sample HG002 was used for benchmarking the algorithms tested. At all depths analyzed, 50X, 30X, 15X, and 5X, GoogleDeep Variant had the highest F1 score, precision, and recall compared to Haplotyper for SNPs and InDels. For somatic SNV detection using SEQCII dataset, Strelka2 had the highest F1 score, precision, and recall (0.9435, 0.9445, 0.9425), followed by MuTect2, MUSE, VarScan2, and SomaticSniper. For somatic InDel detection, MuTect2 and Strelka2 performed similar with MuTect2 higher precision, but Strelka2 had higher recall. These pipelines were utilized to analyze 951 pediatric AML samples, and demonstrated superior processing time and identification of variants, both germline and somatic. Discussion: ML algorithms integrated into a GPU computing environment demonstrated greater precision and accuracy for germline variant detection compared to traditional statistical approaches for variant detection. Ongoing efforts are focused at integration of multiple data sources correlated with outcomes and analyzed via ML tools in order to improve future risk stratification and therapeutic selection for superior outcomes. Citation Format: Erin L. Crowgey, Pankaj Vats, Karl Franke, Gary Burnett, Ankit Sethia, Timothy Harkins, Todd E. Druley. Enhanced processing of genomic sequencing data for pediatric cancers: GPUs and machine learning techniques for variant detection [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 165.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GPU-acceleration enables researchers to rapidly run multiple algorithms for the cost of running a single CPU run.
“First, GPU-acceleration enables researchers to rapidly run multiple algorithms for the cost of running a single CPU run [19].”
From Accelerating genomic workflows using NVIDIA Parabricks (2023) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Accelerating genomic workflows using NVIDIA Parabricks
O’Connell, K. A., Yosufzai, Z. B., Campbell, R. A., Lobb, C. J., Engelken, H. T., Gorrell, L. M., Carlson, T. B., Catana, J. J., Mikdadi, D., Bonazzi, V. R., et al. (2023) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-023-05292-2 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Crowgey, E. L., Vats, P., Franke, K., Burnett, G., Sethia, A., Harkins, T., & Druley, T. E.
- Affiliations
- Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children (US)
- Nvidia (United States) (US)
- 3Washington School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2021-07-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 13_Supplement
- Pages
- 165-165
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W3182732102
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Keywords
- pediatric acute myeloid leukemia, variant calling, somatic variant detection, germline variant calling, DeepVariant, DEEP
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review