Cited by 3Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Abstract CT504: A phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of D-1553, a novel KRASG12C inhibitor, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumor harboring KRASG12C mutation

Abstract

Background: KRASG12C mutation is an oncogenic driver that occurs in approximately 15% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 3% of colorectal cancer (CRC), and ~1% of several other solid tumors. D-1553 is a novel, potent and orally bioavailable KRASG12C inhibitor. Here we present the safety, tolerability and PK and preliminary efficacy of D-1553 from a phase I trial in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic solid tumors harboring KRASG12C mutation. Method: Key inclusion criteria: KRASG12C identified by molecular testing, measurable disease, and refractory to or intolerant of standard therapy. D-1553 dose escalation included oral daily (QD) doses of 150, 300, 600, 800, and 1200 mg, and twice daily (BID) doses of 400, 600, and 800 mg. Primary endpoint: safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints: PK parameters, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and duration of response (DOR), evaluated per RECIST 1.1. Results: As of Dec 27, 2021, 22 pts (12 [54.5%] male, median age 65 [range: 49-90]), including 14 pts with CRC, 6 pts with NSCLC, and 2 pts with other solid tumors, were enrolled. D-1553 was well absorbed, with a median time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) of 1-4 hours. The Cmax and AUC of each dose group (150-600 mg, QD; 400-600 mg, BID) increased linearly as the dose increased. However, the changes of Cmax and AUC in 600-1200 mg (QD), 600-800 mg (BID) groups were not in a dose-dependent manner. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (frequency ≥ 10%) were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, headache, and lethargy, all grade ≤ 2. Thirteen pts (59.1%) had TRAEs: 11 pts (52.4%) had grade 2 or lower TRAEs; 2 (9.1%) had three grade ≥3 TRAEs (hypokalemia, hypertension, anaemia). No DLT has been reported. MTD was not reached. One pt (4.5%) discontinued the D-1553 therapy due to cerebral hemorrhage. This event was evaluated by investigator as unlikely related to the drug. Among 21 evaluable pts (including 14 CRC, 6 NSCLC, and 1 endometrial carcinoma (EC), confirmed ORR and DCR were 19.0% (4/21) and 85.7% (18/21), respectively. One pt with EC achieving PR had the best tumor burden reduction of 80%. Conclusion: In patients with KRASG12C mutated solid tumor, D-1553 is well tolerated with no DLTs at studied doses. The RP2D has been determined to be 600 mg BID. Preliminary efficacy results demonstrate promising clinical activity of single-agent D-1553 in pts with KRASG12C mutated solid tumor. This study is ongoing (NCT04585035) and more results will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Timothy Price, Jaspreet Grewal, Afaf Abed, Melissa Moore, Yu-Min Yeh, Shirish Gadgeel, Gary Richardson, Craig Underhill, Vinod Ganju, Keun-Wook Lee, Seok Jae Huh, Sang-We Kim, Chih-Hsin Yang, Yuh-Min Chen, Ziyong Xiang, Zhe Shi, Yaolin Wang, Ling Zhang, Michael Millward. A phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy of D-1553, a novel KRASG12C inhibitor, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumor harboring KRASG12C mutation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT504.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-ct504

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 3

Metadata

Authors
Price, T., Grewal, J., Abed, A., Moore, M., Yeh, Y.-M., Gadgeel, S., Richardson, G., Underhill, C., Ganju, V., Lee, K.-W., Huh, S. J., Kim, S.-W., Yang, C.-H., Chen, Y.-M., Xiang, Z., Shi, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., & Millward, M.
Affiliations
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU)
  • Norton Healthcare (US)
  • Linear Clinical Research (AU)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
  • National Cheng Kung University Hospital (TW)
  • Henry Ford Hospital (US)
  • Cabrini Hospital (AU)
  • Albury Wodonga Health (AU)
  • 9Peninsula Oncology Centre, Victoria, Australia;
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Dong-A University Hospital (KR)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
  • InventisBio Co., Ltd. (China) (CN)
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2022-06-15
Volume
82
Issue
12_Supplement
Pages
CT504-CT504
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W4282976626
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
KRAS G12C inhibitors, KRAS G12C mutation, pharmacokinetics, dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose, oral anticancer drugs, colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, objective response rate, progression-free survival, safety and tolerability, dose escalation, RECIST 1.1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review