The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abstract LB174: H-optimus-1: A foundation model for computational histopathology
Abstract
Abstract Background: Computational pathology has successfully incorporated artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies for various applications, including the predictions of therapeutic response, molecular biomarkers, and prognosis. Among these methodologies, foundation models (FMs) have arisen as a particularly promising solution, due to their ability to tackle simultaneously a diverse set of downstream use-cases. In this work, we introduce H-optimus-1, a histology foundation model that achieves state-of-the-art performance on a broad range of key downstream tasks, including biomarker prediction, mutation status classification, and spatial gene expression prediction. Methods: H-optimus-1 is a 1.1 billion parameter Vision Transformer (ViT) trained with self-supervised learning. This model was pre-trained on an extensive proprietary dataset consisting of over 1 million whole-slide images (WSI) slides from more than 800,000 patients. This dataset covers over 50 organs; slides were digitized with 3 scanner types across over 4,000 clinical centers. Results: H-optimus-1 was evaluated on 13 downstream tasks encompassing 15 datasets at both the slide level and tile level, including the HEST benchmark (Jaume et al., 2024), which assesses a model’s ability to predict spatial gene expression from histology images in nine different organs. Benchmarked against existing open-source and proprietary foundation models, H-optimus-1 consistently achieved the highest average performance across these tasks. Performance was measured as AUROC on slide-level classification tasks, Pearson correlation to gene expression on HEST, and top-1 accuracy on tile-level classification tasks. Conclusions: Leveraging a large, highly-diverse pre-training dataset, H-optimus-1 achieves state-of-the-art results and high generalizability to key downstream tasks, ranging from metastasis identification to mutation and gene expression prediction. Citation Format: Marin Scalbert, Charlie Saillard, Thomas Peeters, Liam Gonzalez, Dasha Valter, Felipe Llinares-López, Zelda E. Mariet, Rodolphe Jenatton. H-optimus-1: A foundation model for computational histopathology [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(8_Suppl):Abstract nr LB174.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Plattner, C., Sturm, G., Kühl, A. A., Atreya, R. N., Carollo, S., Rieder, D., Gronauer, R., Günther, M., Ormanns, S., Manzl, C., et al. (2025) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.05.023 · Cited by 8
Doeleman, T., Brussee, S., Valkema, P. A., Kempf, W., Vermeer, M. H., Kers, J., Wynaendts, L. C. D., Kerckhoffs, K. G. P., de Jonge, M. M., Nguyen, A. H., et al. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.07.27.26359009
Paun, L. A., Taciuc, I. A., Dumitru, M., Vrînceanu, D., Marinescu, A., DRAGOMIR-SERBOIU, A.-D., Oancea, A. L. A., Cirstoiu, M.-M., & Costache, A. (2026) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers18172752
“…numerous organs, clinical centers, and scanner types using a DINO-based self-supervised strategy, whereas GenBio-PathFM combines DINO-based representation learning with a subsequent JEPA-based refinement stage and emphasizes automated selection of morphologically diverse training data [29,30].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Scalbert, M., Saillard, C., Peeters, T., Gonzalez, L., Valter, D., Llinares-López, F., Mariet, Z. E., & Jenatton, R.
- Affiliations
- Bioptimus, Paris, France.
- Venue
- Cancer Research
- Published
- 2026-04-17
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 8_Supplement
- Pages
- LB174-LB174
- ISSN
- 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-7445
- OpenAlex
- W7154738958
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- computational histopathology, vision transformer, self-supervised pre-training, whole slide images, biomarker prediction, spatial gene expression prediction, model generalization, treatment response prediction, outcome prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review