Metformin Accumulation Correlates with Organic Cation Transporter 2 Protein Expression and Predicts Mammary Tumor Regression In Vivo
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract Several epidemiologic studies have associated metformin treatment with a reduction in breast cancer incidence in prediabetic and type II diabetic populations. Uncertainty exists regarding which patient populations and/or tumor subtypes will benefit from metformin treatment, and most preclinical in vivo studies have given little attention to the cellular pharmacology of intratumoral metformin uptake. Epidemiologic reports consistently link western-style high fat diets (HFD), which drive overweight and obesity, with increased risk of breast cancer. We used a rat model of HFD-induced overweight and mammary carcinogenesis to define intratumoral factors that confer metformin sensitivity. Mammary tumors were initiated with 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea, and rats were randomized into metformin-treated (2 mg/mL drinking water) or control groups (water only) for 8 weeks. Two-thirds of existing mammary tumors responded to metformin treatment with decreased tumor volumes (P < 0.05), reduced proliferative index (P < 0.01), and activated AMPK (P < 0.05). Highly responsive tumors accumulated 3-fold greater metformin amounts (P < 0.05) that were positively correlated with organic cation transporter-2 (OCT2) protein expression (r = 0.57; P = 0.038). Importantly, intratumoral metformin concentration negatively associated with tumor volume (P = 0.03), and each 10 pmol increase in intratumoral metformin predicted >0.11 cm3 reduction in tumor volume. Metformin treatment also decreased proinflammatory arachidonic acid >1.5-fold in responsive tumors (P = 0.023). Collectively, these preclinical data provide evidence for a direct effect of metformin in vivo and suggest that OCT2 expression may predict metformin uptake and tumor response. Cancer Prev Res; 10(3); 198–207. ©2017 AACR.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Comparable data from a high-fat diet rat model of breast cancer showed a positive association with the expression of OCT2 and accumulation of [D6]-metformin isotope.
“Comparable data has also been reported from a study with a high-fat diet rat model of breast cancer showing a positive association with the expression of OCT2 and accumulation of [D6]-metformin isotope (253).”
From A Critical Review of the Evidence That Metformin Is a Putative Anti-Aging Drug That Enhances Healthspan and Extends Lifespan (2021) · cites this paper as [253]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- Checkley, L. A., Rudolph, M. C., Wellberg, E. A., Giles, E. D., Wahdan-Alaswad, R. S., Houck, J. A., Edgerton, S. M., Thor, A. D., Schedin, P., Anderson, S. M., & MacLean, P. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Corresponding author
- MacLean, Paul S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Prevention Research
- Published
- 2017-03-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 198-207
- ISSN
- 1940-6207 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-6215
- PMC
- PMC5405741
- OpenAlex
- W2585504477
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cancer Prevention Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (2p01hd038129-11a1, UL1TR001082)
- National Cancer Institute (K99CA169430, R01CA164166, P30CA046934, R00CA169430)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK048520)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K12HD057022, P01 HD-038129, P50HD073063, T32HD007186)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Keywords
- metformin, organic cation transporter 2, OCT2, breast cancer, tumor regression, intratumoral drug accumulation, high-fat diet, mammary carcinogenesis, AMPK activation, arachidonic acid, tumor inflammation, drug uptake, predictive biomarkers, type 2 diabetes
- MeSH terms
- Organic Cation Transporter 2, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Female, Hypoglycemic Agents, Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental, Metformin, Rats, Wistar, Organic Cation Transport Proteins, Cell Proliferation, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review