Cited by 47Colorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionGenetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

Sessile serrated polyps and colon cancer prevention

Rashtak, Shahrooz, Rego, Rafaela, Sweetser, Seth R., Sinicrope, Frank A.·2017·Cancer Prevention Research

Abstract

Abstract Evidence suggests that up to one fifth of colorectal carcinomas develop from serrated polyps, named for their pattern of colonic crypts, and include the sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) that has malignant potential. SSA/Ps are typically located in the proximal colon and have molecular features of hypermethylation of CpG islands in gene promoters and activating point mutations (V600E) in the BRAF oncogene. Both of these features are seen in sporadic colorectal carcinomas with microsatellite instability (MSI) which is potentially consistent with an origin of these cancers from precursor SSA/Ps. Dysplasia is detected in a subset of SSA/Ps with a high risk of progression to carcinoma. An uncommon serrated polyp is the traditional serrated adenoma that is typically found in the left colon, has a tubulovillous architecture, and frequently harbors mutant KRAS. To date, the epidemiology of these serrated lesions is poorly understood, and limited observational data suggest a potential chemopreventive benefit of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The current primary strategy to reduce the risk of colorectal carcinoma from serrated polyps is to enhance their detection at colonoscopy and to ensure their complete removal. This review provides insight into the epidemiologic, clinical, histopathologic, and molecular features of serrated polyps and includes data on their endoscopic detection and chemoprevention. Cancer Prev Res; 10(5); 270–8. ©2017 AACR.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-16-0264

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 99 · Cited by 47

Authors
Rashtak, S., Rego, R., Sweetser, S. R., & Sinicrope, F. A.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Sinicrope, Frank A.
Venue
Cancer Prevention Research
Published
2017-05-01
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
270-278
ISSN
  • 1940-6207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6215
OpenAlex
W2600343852
Cited by
47
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Prevention Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
sessile serrated polyps, sessile serrated adenoma, traditional serrated adenoma, colorectal cancer, serrated precursor lesions, BRAF V600E mutation, CpG island hypermethylation, microsatellite instability, KRAS mutation, dysplasia, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, chemoprevention, polypectomy
MeSH terms
Colonic Neoplasms, Colonic Polyps, Humans, Adenomatous Polyps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review