Cited by 283Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsCell death mechanisms and regulationHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BIM expression in treatment-naive cancers predicts responsiveness to kinase inhibitors

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Cancers with specific genetic mutations are susceptible to selective kinase inhibitors. However, there is a wide spectrum of benefit among cancers harboring the same sensitizing genetic mutations. Herein, we measured apoptotic rates among cell lines sharing the same driver oncogene following treatment with the corresponding kinase inhibitor. There was a wide range of kinase inhibitor-induced apoptosis despite comparable inhibition of the target and associated downstream signaling pathways. Surprisingly, pretreatment RNA levels of the BH3-only pro-apoptotic BIM strongly predicted the capacity of EGFR, HER2, and PI3K inhibitors to induce apoptosis in EGFR-mutant, HER2-amplified, and PIK3CA-mutant cancers, respectively, but BIM levels did not predict responsiveness to standard chemotherapies. Furthermore, BIM RNA levels in EGFR-mutant lung cancer specimens predicted response and duration of clinical benefit from EGFR inhibitors. These findings suggest assessment of BIM levels in treatment-naïve tumor biopsies may indicate the degree of benefit from single-agent kinase inhibitors in multiple oncogene-addiction paradigms. Significance: In several oncogene-addiction paradigms, assessment of BIM RNA levels identifies those cancers that fail to have substantial apoptotic responses to kinase inhibitors. BIM RNA levels may be assessed in diagnostic cancer specimens to predict which patients will receive less benefit from single-agent kinase inhibitors. Cancer Discovery: 1(4); 352–65. ©2011 AACR. Read the Commentary on this article by Yoshida and Haura, p. 289 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 275

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-11-0106

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 50 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–282 of 282

Metadata

Authors
Faber, A. C., Corcoran, R. B., Ebi, H., Sequist, L. V., Waltman, B. A., Chung, E., Incio, J., Digumarthy, S. R., Pollack, S. F., Song, Y., Muzikansky, A., Lifshits, E., Roberge, S., Coffman, E. J., Benes, C. H., Gómez, H. L., Baselga, J., Arteaga, C. L., Rivera, M. N., Dias-Santagata, D., Jain, R. K., & Engelman, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Authors' Affiliations: 1Pathology and 2Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; 3Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston; 4Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston; 5Radiation Oncology, Steele Lab for Tumor Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts; 6Department of Medicine, 7Breast Cancer Research Program, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee; 8Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Perú
Corresponding author
Engelman, Jeffrey A.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2011-09-01
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
352-365
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2117986690
Cited by
283
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 22
FWCI
24.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA127003, R01CA080195, R01CA140594, P50CA090578, P01CA080124, P20CA090578, R01CA135257, K08CA120060, P50CA098131, R01CA137008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Keywords
building information modeling, BH3-only proteins, kinase inhibitors, predictive biomarkers, apoptosis, EGFR inhibitors, HER2 inhibitors, PI3K inhibitors, oncogene addiction, EGFR-mutant lung cancer, PIK3CA mutation, treatment-naive tumors, drug response prediction
MeSH terms
Bcl-2-Like Protein 11, Phosphoinositide-3 Kinase Inhibitors, Animals, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Membrane Proteins, Mice, Nude, Oncogenes, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Signal Transduction, Apoptosis, Receptor, ErbB-2, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins, BH3 Interacting Domain Death Agonist Protein, Mice, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review