Epigenetic Identity in AML Depends on Disruption of Nonpromoter Regulatory Elements and Is Affected by Antagonistic Effects of Mutations in Epigenetic Modifiers
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
We performed cytosine methylation sequencing on genetically diverse patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and found leukemic DNA methylation patterning is primarily driven by nonpromoter regulatory elements and CpG shores. Enhancers displayed stronger differential methylation than promoters, consisting predominantly of hypomethylation. AMLs with dominant hypermethylation featured greater epigenetic disruption of promoters, whereas those with dominant hypomethylation displayed greater disruption of distal and intronic regions. Mutations in IDH and DNMT3A had opposing and mutually exclusive effects on the epigenome. Notably, co-occurrence of both mutations resulted in epigenetic antagonism, with most CpGs affected by either mutation alone no longer affected in double-mutant AMLs. Importantly, this epigenetic antagonism precedes malignant transformation and can be observed in preleukemic LSK cells from Idh2R140Q or Dnmt3aR882H single-mutant and Idh2R140Q/Dnmt3aR882H double-mutant mice. Notably, IDH/DNMT3A double-mutant AMLs manifested upregulation of a RAS signaling signature and displayed unique sensitivity to MEK inhibition ex vivo as compared with AMLs with either single mutation. Significance: AML is biologically heterogeneous with subtypes characterized by specific genetic and epigenetic abnormalities. Comprehensive DNA methylation profiling revealed that differential methylation of nonpromoter regulatory elements is a driver of epigenetic identity, that gene mutations can be context-dependent, and that co-occurrence of mutations in epigenetic modifiers can result in epigenetic antagonism. Cancer Discov; 7(8); 868–83. ©2017 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 783
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Up to 90% of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) harbour a point mutation in canonical (HIST1H3B (H3.1)) or variant (H3F3A (H3.3)) histone H3, resulting in a lysine 27 to methionine (K27M) substitution.
“Of these, up to 90% of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) harbour a point mutation in canonical ( HIST1H3B (H3.1)) or variant ( H3F3A (H3.3)) histone H3, resulting in a lysine 27 to methionine (K27M) substitution 101-103 .”
From The roles of DNA, RNA and histone methylation in ageing and cancer (2019) · cites this paper as [101]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 142
- Authors
- Glass, J. L., Hassane, D., Wouters, B. J., Kunimoto, H., Avellino, R., Garrett-Bakelman, F. E., Guryanova, O. A., Bowman, R., Redlich, S., Intlekofer, A. M., Meydan, C., Qin, T., Fall, M., Alonso, A., Guzman, M. L., Valk, P. J. M., Thompson, C. B., Levine, R., Elemento, O., Delwel, R., Melnick, A., & Figueroa, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- University of Virginia (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- 2Department of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology Division, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York.
- 11Department of Human Genetics and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
- Corresponding author
- Delwel, Ruud
- Melnick, Ari
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Discovery
- Published
- 2017-08-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 868-883
- ISSN
- 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-8290
- PMC
- PMC5540802
- OpenAlex
- W2606122123
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 11.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
- European Hematology Association (CRTH26, TRTH89, TRTH11)
- Weill Cornell Medical College
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL126947)
- National Cancer Institute (R00CA178191, K08CA169055, K99CA178191, R01CA198089, T32CA009207)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
- Keywords
- acute myeloid leukemia, DNA methylation, enhancers, IDH mutation, DNMT3A mutation, Ras signaling, MEK inhibition, hypomethylation, hypermethylation
- MeSH terms
- DNA Methyltransferase 3A, Adult, Aged, Animals, Disease Models, Animal, DNA (Cytosine-5-)-Methyltransferases, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Female, Humans, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, ras Proteins, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review