Exploiting MCL1 Dependency with Combination MEK + MCL1 Inhibitors Leads to Induction of Apoptosis and Tumor Regression in KRAS -Mutant Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
BH3 mimetic drugs, which inhibit prosurvival BCL2 family proteins, have limited single-agent activity in solid tumor models. The potential of BH3 mimetics for these cancers may depend on their ability to potentiate the apoptotic response to chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Using a novel class of potent and selective MCL1 inhibitors, we demonstrate that concurrent MEK + MCL1 inhibition induces apoptosis and tumor regression in KRAS-mutant non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) models, which respond poorly to MEK inhibition alone. Susceptibility to BH3 mimetics that target either MCL1 or BCL-xL was determined by the differential binding of proapoptotic BCL2 proteins to MCL1 or BCL-xL, respectively. The efficacy of dual MEK + MCL1 blockade was augmented by prior transient exposure to BCL-xL inhibitors, which promotes the binding of proapoptotic BCL2 proteins to MCL1. This suggests a novel strategy for integrating BH3 mimetics that target different BCL2 family proteins for KRAS-mutant NSCLC. Significance: Defining the molecular basis for MCL1 versus BCL-xL dependency will be essential for effective prioritization of BH3 mimetic combination therapies in the clinic. We discover a novel strategy for integrating BCL-xL and MCL1 inhibitors to drive and subsequently exploit apoptotic dependencies of KRAS-mutant NSCLCs treated with MEK inhibitors. See related commentary by Leber et al., p. 1511. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1494
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NSCLC exhibits heterogeneous dependency on MCL1, BCL-xL, and BCL-2.
“This finding is particularly important for NSCLCs, as this tumor type has been shown to exhibit a heterogeneous dependency on MCL1, BCL-xL, and BCL-2 (28).”
From Cotargeting a MYC/eIF4A-survival axis improves the efficacy of KRAS inhibitors in lung cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [28]
The Discussion (page unavailable) says apoptotic dependencies vary among KRAS-mutant NSCLC cell lines, which may depend on MCL-1, BCL-XL, both, or neither. The Results (page unavailable) report very little activity from the selective BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax, so the paper does not support including BCL-2 as a demonstrated dependency; its findings are also specific to KRAS-mutant cell lines rather than all NSCLC. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredGenomic features associated with sensitivity to BH3 mimetics in oncogene-addicted solid tumors have been elusive.
“Our finding that LKB1 regulates the apoptotic dependency of KRAS-mutant lung cancers is unexpected, as genomic features associated with sensitivity to BH3 mimetics in oncogene-addicted solid tumors have been elusive12,16,17.”
From LKB1 regulates JNK-dependent stress signaling and apoptotic dependency of KRAS-mutant lung cancers (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
The Discussion (page unavailable) says reliable biomarkers for selecting BH3 mimetics are still needed and that whether co-occurring mutations explain differences in apoptotic dependency remains undetermined. This supports the difficulty of identifying predictors in the studied KRAS-mutant lung cancer models, but does not establish that genomic predictors have been elusive across oncogene-addicted solid tumors generally. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCombining MEK inhibitors with BH3 mimetics, which competitively bind to BCL-XL or MCL-1 and liberate BIM, can induce apoptosis and lead to regression of KRAS-mutant tumors.
“Combining MEK inhibitors with BH3 mimetics, which competitively bind to BCL-XL or MCL-1 and liberate BIM, can induce apoptosis and lead to regression of KRAS-mutant tumors12,16,17.”
From LKB1 regulates JNK-dependent stress signaling and apoptotic dependency of KRAS-mutant lung cancers (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Co-IP experiments revealed increased BIM bound to MCL-1 and BCL-XL after trametinib treatment.
“Co-IP experiments revealed increased BIM bound to MCL-1 and BCL-XL after trametinib treatment (Fig. S10A–C), consistent with prior studies16.”
From LKB1 regulates JNK-dependent stress signaling and apoptotic dependency of KRAS-mutant lung cancers (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Nangia, V., Siddiqui, F. M., Caenepeel, S., Timonina, D., Bilton, S. J., Phan, N., Gomez-Caraballo, M., Archibald, H. L., Li, C., Fraser, C., Rigas, D., Vajda, K., Ferris, L. A., Lanuti, M., Wright, C. D., Raskin, K. A., Cahill, D. P., Shin, J. H., Keyes, C., Sequist, L. V., Piotrowska, Z., Farago, A. F., Azzoli, C. G., Gainor, J. F., Sarosiek, K. A., Brown, S. P., Coxon, A., Benes, C. H., Hughes, P. E., & Hata, A. N.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Amgen (United States) (US)
- 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hata, Aaron N.
- ORCID
- Nangia, Varuna
- Caenepeel, Sean
- Phan, Nicole
- Li, Chendi
- Fraser, Cameron
- Rigas, Diamanda
- Lanuti, Michael
- Cahill, Daniel P.
- Shin, John H.
- Keyes, Colleen
- Sequist, Lecia V.
- Piotrowska, Zofia
- Farago, Anna F.
- Azzoli, Christopher G.
- Gainor, Justin F.
- Sarosiek, Kristopher A.
- Brown, Sean P.
- Coxon, Angela
- Benes, Cyril H.
- Hughes, Paul E.
- Hata, Aaron N.
- Venue
- Cancer Discovery
- Published
- 2018-12-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1598-1613
- ISSN
- 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-8290
- PMC
- PMC6279543
- OpenAlex
- W2892395616
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 4.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO
- Uniting Against Lung Cancer (UALC)
- Stand Up To Cancer
- HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01CA14059408)
- Lungstrong
- Be A Piece of the Solution
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Keywords
- Mcl-1 inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, KRAS-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, BH3 mimetics, Bcl-xL, Bcl-2 family proteins, apoptosis, combination therapy, Bcl-xL inhibitors, tumor regression
- MeSH terms
- A549 Cells, Aniline Compounds, Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Benzamides, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Diphenylamine, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Mice, Nude, Sulfonamides, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), Mice, SCID, Apoptosis, Mice, Knockout, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, Tumor Burden, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Myeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1 Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review