Cited by 167Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Selective inhibition of HDAC3 targets synthetic vulnerabilities and activates immune surveillance in lymphoma

Open access
Mondello, Patrizia, Tadros, Saber, Teater, Matt, Fontan, Lorena, Chang, Aaron Y., Jain, Neeraj, Yang, Haopeng, Singh, Shailbala +21 more·2020·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract CREBBP mutations are highly recurrent in B-cell lymphomas and either inactivate its histone acetyltransferase (HAT) domain or truncate the protein. Herein, we show that these two classes of mutations yield different degrees of disruption of the epigenome, with HAT mutations being more severe and associated with inferior clinical outcome. Genes perturbed by CREBBP mutation are direct targets of the BCL6–HDAC3 onco-repressor complex. Accordingly, we show that HDAC3-selective inhibitors reverse CREBBP-mutant aberrant epigenetic programming, resulting in: (i) growth inhibition of lymphoma cells through induction of BCL6 target genes such as CDKN1A and (ii) restoration of immune surveillance due to induction of BCL6-repressed IFN pathway and antigen-presenting genes. By reactivating these genes, exposure to HDAC3 inhibitors restored the ability of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to kill DLBCL cells in an MHC class I and II–dependent manner, and synergized with PD-L1 blockade in a syngeneic model in vivo. Hence, HDAC3 inhibition represents a novel mechanism-based immune epigenetic therapy for CREBBP-mutant lymphomas. Significance: We have leveraged the molecular characterization of different types of CREBBP mutations to define a rational approach for targeting these mutations through selective inhibition of HDAC3. This represents an attractive therapeutic avenue for targeting synthetic vulnerabilities in CREBBP-mutant cells in tandem with promoting antitumor immunity. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 327

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-0116

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 167

Authors
Mondello, P., Tadros, S., Teater, M., Fontan, L., Chang, A. Y., Jain, N., Yang, H., Singh, S., Ying, H.-Y., Chu, C.-S., Ma, M. C. J., Toska, E., Alig, S., Durant, M., de Stanchina, E., Ghosh, S., Mottok, A., Nastoupil, L., Neelapu, S. S., Weigert, O., Inghirami, G., Baselga, J., Younes, A., Yee, C., Dogan, A., Scheinberg, D. A., Roeder, R. G., Melnick, A. M., & Green, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • 1Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Rockefeller University (US)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • 8Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • 5Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York.
  • 12Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2020-03-01
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
440-459
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W3000215297
Cited by
167
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 2
FWCI
8.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Cancer Institute (CA201380, CA055349, CA192937, CA016672, CA008748, CA178765)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
HDAC3 inhibitors, CREBBP mutation, B-cell lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, epigenetic reprogramming, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 blockade, antigen presentation, histone deacetylase, MHC class I and II
MeSH terms
Epigenome, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Histone Deacetylase 3, Animals, Antigen-Presenting Cells, Histocompatibility Antigens Class II, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Genes, MHC Class I, Histone Deacetylases, Humans, Immune System, Interferons, Lymphoma, Mutation, Signal Transduction, Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21, CREB-Binding Protein, Mice, Histone Acetyltransferases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-6, Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors, B7-H1 Antigen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review