Histone Lysine Methylation Dynamics Control EGFR DNA Copy-Number Amplification
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Acquired chromosomal DNA copy gains are a feature of many tumors; however, the mechanisms that underpin oncogene amplification are poorly understood. Recent studies have begun to uncover the importance of epigenetic states and histone lysine methyltransferases (KMT) and demethylases (KDM) in regulating transient site-specific DNA copy-number gains (TSSG). In this study, we reveal a critical interplay between a myriad of lysine methyltransferases and demethylases in modulating H3K4/9/27 methylation balance to control extrachromosomal amplification of the EGFR oncogene. This study further establishes that cellular signals (hypoxia and EGF) are able to directly promote EGFR amplification through modulation of the enzymes controlling EGFR copy gains. Moreover, we demonstrate that chemical inhibitors targeting specific KMTs and KDMs are able to promote or block extrachromosomal EGFR amplification, which identifies potential therapeutic strategies for controlling EGFR copy-number heterogeneity in cancer, and, in turn, drug response. Significance: This study identifies a network of epigenetic factors and cellular signals that directly control EGFR DNA amplification. We demonstrate that chemical inhibitors targeting enzymes controlling this amplification can be used to rheostat EGFR copy number, which uncovers therapeutic opportunities for controlling EGFR DNA amplification heterogeneity and the associated drug response. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 161
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Targeting KDM4 may be used to overcome cetuximab resistance in CRC with high EGFR gene copy number, since inhibiting KDM4 reduced EGFR amplifications in CRC cells.
“Furthermore, targeting KDM4 (demethylase for H3K9 and H3K36) may be used to overcome cetuximab resistance in CRC with high EGFR gene copy number, since inhibiting KDM4 reduced EGFR amplifications in CRC cells [175].”
From Mechanisms and Strategies to Overcome Drug Resistance in Colorectal Cancer (2025) · cites this paper as [175]
The Results section (page unavailable) reports that KDM4 inhibition reduced EGFR amplification in HCC827 lung cancer cells, not CRC cells. It does not show that KDM4 targeting overcomes cetuximab resistance in CRC; in those lung cells, reduced amplification correlated with a reduced response to a different EGFR inhibitor, gefitinib. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 50
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [62]Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2010; 26(5): 589– 95 doi 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698. 20080505 PMC2828108 · DOI · Paper page
- Authors
- Clarke, T. L., Tang, R., Chakraborty, D., Van Rechem, C., Ji, F., Mishra, S., Ma, A., Kaniskan, H. Ü., Jin, J., Lawrence, M. S., Sadreyev, R. I., & Whetstine, J. R.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- 1Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts.
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Tisch Cancer Institute (US)
- 4Departments of Pharmacological Sciences and Oncological Sciences, Mount Sinai Center for Therapeutics Discovery, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
- Broad Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Whetstine, Johnathan R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Discovery
- Published
- 2020-02-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 306-325
- ISSN
- 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-8290
- PMC
- PMC7271978
- OpenAlex
- W2989840253
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH NCI (R01GM097360, P30 CA006927)
- NIH (P30 DK040561, R01GM122749)
- EMBO (ALTF 449-2017)
- Ovarian Cancer Research Fund (543667)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
- Keywords
- EGFR, histone lysine methylation, histone lysine methyltransferase, histone demethylase, H3K4 methylation, H3K9 methylation, H3K27 methylation, hypoxia, EGF signaling, drug response
- MeSH terms
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Gene Amplification, Histones, Humans, Lysine, Neoplasms, Histone-Lysine N-Methyltransferase, Cell Hypoxia, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Cell Line, Tumor, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Jumonji Domain-Containing Histone Demethylases, DNA Copy Number Variations, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review