Cited by 352Adenosine and Purinergic SignalingCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Adenosine 2A Receptor Blockade as an Immunotherapy for Treatment-Refractory Renal Cell Cancer

Open access
Fong, Lawrence, Hotson, Andrew, Powderly, John D., Sznol, Mario, Heist, Rebecca S., Choueiri, Toni K., George, Saby, Hughes, Brett G.M. +25 more·2020·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Adenosine mediates immunosuppression within the tumor microenvironment through triggering adenosine 2A receptors (A2AR) on immune cells. To determine whether this pathway could be targeted as an immunotherapy, we performed a phase I clinical trial with a small-molecule A2AR antagonist. We find that this molecule can safely block adenosine signaling in vivo. In a cohort of 68 patients with renal cell cancer (RCC), we also observe clinical responses alone and in combination with an anti–PD-L1 antibody, including subjects who had progressed on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Durable clinical benefit is associated with increased recruitment of CD8+ T cells into the tumor. Treatment can also broaden the circulating T-cell repertoire. Clinical responses are associated with an adenosine-regulated gene-expression signature in pretreatment tumor biopsies. A2AR signaling, therefore, represents a targetable immune checkpoint distinct from PD-1/PD-L1 that restricts antitumor immunity. Significance: This first-in-human study of an A2AR antagonist for cancer treatment establishes the safety and feasibility of targeting this pathway by demonstrating antitumor activity with single-agent and anti–PD-L1 combination therapy in patients with refractory RCC. Responding patients possess an adenosine-regulated gene-expression signature in pretreatment tumor biopsies. See related commentary by Sitkovsky, p. 16. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-0980

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 352

Authors
Fong, L., Hotson, A., Powderly, J. D., Sznol, M., Heist, R. S., Choueiri, T. K., George, S., Hughes, B. G. M., Hellmann, M. D., Shepard, D. R., Rini, B. I., Kummar, S., Weise, A. M., Riese, M. J., Markman, B., Emens, L. A., Mahadevan, D., Luke, J. J., Laport, G., Brody, J. D., Hernandez-Aya, L., Bonomi, P., Goldman, J. W., Berim, L., Renouf, D. J., Goodwin, R. A., Munneke, B., Ho, P. Y., Hsieh, J., McCaffery, I., Kwei, L., Willingham, S. B., & Miller, R. A.
Affiliations
  • UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • 2Corvus Pharmaceuticals, Burlingame, California.
  • Carolina BioOncology Institute (US)
  • Yale Cancer Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • Monash Health (AU)
  • UPMC Hillman Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Arizona Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • 19Washington University Siteman Cancer Center, St Louis, Missouri.
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Nebraska Medical Center (US)
  • 23BC Cancer - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Ottawa Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Fong, Lawrence
  • Miller, Richard A.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2020-01-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
40-53
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2987822998
Cited by
352
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 36 · 2013: 1
FWCI
25.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
NIH (NIHR01CA223484, U01CA233100)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
renal cell carcinoma, treatment-refractory cancer, immunotherapy, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, PD-L1 inhibitors, immune checkpoint, CD8+ T cell recruitment, T cell receptor repertoire, small molecule inhibitors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Furans, Humans, Kidney Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prognosis, Pyridines, Pyrimidines, Survival Rate, Salvage Therapy, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Receptor, Adenosine A2A, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review