Pharmacologic Activation of p53 Triggers Viral Mimicry Response Thereby Abolishing Tumor Immune Evasion and Promoting Antitumor Immunity
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The repression of repetitive elements is an important facet of p53's function as a guardian of the genome. Paradoxically, we found that p53 activated by MDM2 inhibitors induced the expression of endogenous retroviruses (ERV) via increased occupancy on ERV promoters and inhibition of two major ERV repressors, histone demethylase LSD1 and DNA methyltransferase DNMT1. Double-stranded RNA stress caused by ERVs triggered type I/III interferon expression and antigen processing and presentation. Pharmacologic activation of p53 in vivo unleashed the IFN program, promoted T-cell infiltration, and significantly enhanced the efficacy of checkpoint therapy in an allograft tumor model. Furthermore, the MDM2 inhibitor ALRN-6924 induced a viral mimicry pathway and tumor inflammation signature genes in patients with melanoma. Our results identify ERV expression as the central mechanism whereby p53 induction overcomes tumor immune evasion and transforms tumor microenvironment to a favorable phenotype, providing a rationale for the synergy of MDM2 inhibitors and immunotherapy. Significance: We found that p53 activated by MDM2 inhibitors induced the expression of ERVs, in part via epigenetic factors LSD1 and DNMT1. Induction of IFN response caused by ERV derepression upon p53-targeting therapies provides a possibility to overcome resistance to immune checkpoint blockade and potentially transform “cold” tumors into “hot.” This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2945
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ALRN-6924 is a staple peptide drug developed by Aileron to target a variety of cancers by reactivating p53-mediated tumor inhibition.
“ALRN-6924 (148) is a staple peptide drug developed by Aileron to target a variety of cancers by reactivating p53-mediated tumor inhibition.”
From Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials (2023) · cites this paper as [395]
ALRN-6924 combines the α-helical conformation of peptides to overcome the stability and membrane permeability issues that commonly affect traditional peptide drugs.
“ALRN-6924 is a staple peptide drug that combines the α-helical conformation of peptides to overcome the stability and membrane permeability issues that commonly affect traditional peptide drugs.395”
From Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials (2023) · cites this paper as [395]
ALRN-6924 targets two major p53 suppressor proteins, MDMX and MDM2, to induce cell cycle arrest and raise p21, a known inhibitor of the cell replication cycle.
“Specifically, it targets two major p53 suppressor proteins, MDMX and MDM2, to induce cell cycle arrest and raise p21, a known inhibitor of the cell replication cycle.”
From Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials (2023) · cites this paper as [395]
In preclinical mouse models, ALRN-6924 has shown activity as a radio-protectant that also prevents chemotherapy-induced toxicity.
“In preclinical mouse models, ALRN-6924 has shown activity as a radio-protectant that also prevents chemotherapy-induced toxicity.217,395,396”
From Recent advances in targeting the “undruggable” proteins: from drug discovery to clinical trials (2023) · cites this paper as [395]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 169
- Authors
- Zhou, X., Singh, M., Sanz Santos, G., Guerlavais, V., Carvajal, L. A., Aivado, M., Zhan, Y., Oliveira, M. M. S., Westerberg, L. S., Annis, D. A., Johnsen, J. I., & Selivanova, G.
- Affiliations
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- 1Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
- 2Aileron Therapeutics, Inc., Watertown, Massachusetts.
- Corresponding author
- Selivanova, Galina
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Discovery
- Published
- 2021-07-06
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3090-3105
- ISSN
- 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-8290
- PMC
- PMC9414294
- OpenAlex
- W3180654212
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Vetenskapsrådet (2019-01725)
- Cancerfonden (20 1127 PjF 01 H)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Keywords
- p53 activation, MDM2 inhibitors, endogenous retroviruses, viral mimicry, tumor immune evasion, interferon response, LSD1, DNMT1, epigenetic repression, antigen processing and presentation, T cell infiltration, immune checkpoint blockade, melanoma, tumor microenvironment
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Immunotherapy, Interferon Type I, Melanoma, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Tumor Escape, Tumor Microenvironment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review