EGFR Inhibition Potentiates FGFR Inhibitor Therapy and Overcomes Resistance in FGFR2 Fusion–Positive Cholangiocarcinoma
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
FGFR inhibitors are approved for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 fusions. However, the response rate is moderate, and resistance emerges rapidly due to acquired secondary FGFR2 mutations or due to other less-defined mechanisms. Here, we conducted high-throughput combination drug screens, biochemical analysis, and therapeutic studies using patient-derived models of FGFR2 fusion–positive cholangiocarcinoma to gain insight into these clinical profiles and uncover improved treatment strategies. We found that feedback activation of EGFR signaling limits FGFR inhibitor efficacy, restricting cell death induction in sensitive models and causing resistance in insensitive models lacking secondary FGFR2 mutations. Inhibition of wild-type EGFR potentiated responses to FGFR inhibitors in both contexts, durably suppressing MEK/ERK and mTOR signaling, increasing apoptosis, and causing marked tumor regressions in vivo. Our findings reveal EGFR-dependent adaptive signaling as an important mechanism limiting FGFR inhibitor efficacy and driving resistance and support clinical testing of FGFR/EGFR inhibitor therapy for FGFR2 fusion–positive cholangiocarcinoma. Significance: We demonstrate that feedback activation of EGFR signaling limits the effectiveness of FGFR inhibitor therapy and drives adaptive resistance in patient-derived models of FGFR2 fusion–positive cholangiocarcinoma. These studies support the potential of combination treatment with FGFR and EGFR inhibitors as an improved treatment for patients with FGFR2-driven cholangiocarcinoma. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1171
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EGFR is required for CRC progression and treatment response.
“EGFR is required for CRC progression and treatment response [28–30]”
From Feedback activation of EGFR/wild-type RAS signaling axis limits KRASG12D inhibitor efficacy in KRASG12D-mutated colorectal cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
The Discussion (page unavailable) says EGFR activation can offset inhibition of oncogenic RTK–RAS signaling and cites colorectal-cancer studies; the References identify studies linking EGFR activation to resistance to targeted treatments in colorectal cancer. The paper does not establish that EGFR is required for CRC progression, and its treatment-response point concerns specific targeted therapies rather than treatment response generally. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredERRFI1 is associated with tumor development and drug resistance.
“Given that ERRFI1 is associated with tumor development and drug resistance [29, 39, 40]”
From Feedback activation of EGFR/wild-type RAS signaling axis limits KRASG12D inhibitor efficacy in KRASG12D-mutated colorectal cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
The Results section reports that ERRFI1 knockdown caused FGFR inhibitor resistance in FGFR2-fusion-positive cholangiocarcinoma cells. The Discussion also links ERRFI1 loss to EGFR signaling in those cells, but does not establish an association with tumor development. The claim extends beyond the paper's finding on drug resistance. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredERRFI1 is a crucial negative regulator of EGFR.
“We examined transcriptional changes in genes encoding intrinsic negative regulators of EGFR, including ERRFI1 [29, 35, 36], CDC25C [37], and CBL [38] (Fig. 3E).”
From Feedback activation of EGFR/wild-type RAS signaling axis limits KRASG12D inhibitor efficacy in KRASG12D-mutated colorectal cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Feedback activation of EGFR signaling is a putative event elicited by targeted inhibition of mitogenic pathways.
“Although feedback activation of EGFR signaling has been established as a putative event elicited by targeted inhibition of mitogenic pathways [14, 29]”
From Feedback activation of EGFR/wild-type RAS signaling axis limits KRASG12D inhibitor efficacy in KRASG12D-mutated colorectal cancer (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 104
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [28]Casaletto J, Maglic D, Toure BB, Taylor A, Schoenherr H, Hudson B, Abstract 1455: RLY-4008, a novel precision therapy for FGFR2-driven cancers designed to potently and selectively inhibit FGFR2 and FGFR2 resistance mutations. Cancer Res. 2021; 81: 1455– 1455.
- [45]Goyal L, Baiev I, Zhang K, Dalgai S, Shroff RT, Kelley RK,, Acquired resistance to selective FGFR inhibitors in FGFR-altered cholangiocarcinoma. European Journal of Cancer, 2020- 10, Vol. 138, p. S21– S22.
- Authors
- Wu, Q., Zhen, Y., Shi, L., Vu, P., Greninger, P., Adil, R., Merritt, J., Egan, R., Wu, M.-J., Yin, X., Ferrone, C. R., Deshpande, V., Baiev, I., Pinto, C. J., McLoughlin, D. E., Walmsley, C. S., Stone, J. R., Gordan, J. D., Zhu, A. X., Juric, D., Goyal, L., Benes, C. H., & Bardeesy, N.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Benes, Cyril H.
- Bardeesy, Nabeel
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Discovery
- Published
- 2022-02-25
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1378-1395
- ISSN
- 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-8290
- PMC
- PMC9064956
- OpenAlex
- W4224039601
- Semantic Scholar
- f9b30b239c9ad4a267b63253ebc4ef71bf8e79e8
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 9
- FWCI
- 20.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NIH (P50CA127003)
- TargetCancer Foundation Wellcome Trust (102696)
- DOD (CA160216)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
- Keywords
- FGFR2 fusion, cholangiocarcinoma, EGFR inhibition, FGFR inhibitor resistance, adaptive resistance, feedback signaling, MEK/ERK signaling, mTOR signaling, apoptosis, combination therapy, patient-derived models, FGFR2 mutations
- MeSH terms
- Bile Duct Neoplasms, Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic, Humans, Pyrimidines, Cholangiocarcinoma, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 2, ErbB Receptors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review