Cited by 37Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchBacteriophages and microbial interactions

Phage-Based Anti-HER2 Vaccination Can Circumvent Immune Tolerance against Breast Cancer

Open access
Bartolacci, Caterina, Andreani, Cristina, Curcio, Claudia, Occhipinti, Sergio, Massaccesi, Luca, Giovarelli, Mirella, Galeazzi, Roberta, Iezzi, Manuela +5 more·2018·Cancer Immunology Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Δ16HER2 is a splice variant of HER2 and defined as the transforming isoform in HER2-positive breast cancer. It has been shown that Δ16HER2 promotes breast cancer aggressiveness and drug resistance. In the present work, we used in silico modeling to identify structural differences between Δ16HER2 and the wild-type HER2 proteins. We then developed DNA vaccines specifically against the Δ16HER2 isoform and showed that these immunotherapies hampered carcinogenesis in a breast cancer transplantable model. However, the vaccines failed to elicit immune protection in Δ16HER2 transgenic mice because of tolerogenic mechanisms toward the human HER2 self-antigen, a scenario commonly seen in HER2+ patients. Thus, we engineered bacteriophages with immunogenic epitopes of Δ16HER2 exposed on their coat for use as anticancer vaccines. These phage-based vaccines were able to break immune tolerance, triggering a protective anti-Δ16HER2 humoral response. These findings provide a rationale for the use of phage-based anti-HER2/Δ16HER2 vaccination as a safe and efficacious immunotherapy against HER2-positive breast cancers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-18-0179

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • M13 filamentous phages displaying HER2/neu epitopes elicited antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses and suppressed tumor growth in murine breast cancer models.

    “For example, M13 filamentous phages displaying HER2/neu epitopes elicited antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses and suppressed tumor growth in murine breast cancer models [80,81]”

    From Phage therapy in oncology: opportunities for cancer prevention and treatment (2026) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Introduction describes M13 phages displaying HER2 epitopes, and ‘Phages displaying antigen sequences can overcome immune tolerance’ reports smaller and fewer tumors in vaccinated D16HER2 mice. That section also reports increased tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells, but does not establish that they were antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. The paper’s functional cytotoxic T-cell assays concern DNA vaccination, not phage vaccination. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Engineered phage vaccines displaying tumor-associated antigens or delivering immunostimulatory cargo have demonstrated robust antitumor immunity and survival benefits in multiple mouse models.

    “In parallel, engineered phage vaccines displaying tumor-associated antigens or delivering immunostimulatory cargo have demonstrated robust antitumor immunity and survival benefits in multiple mouse models [80–85]”

    From Phage therapy in oncology: opportunities for cancer prevention and treatment (2026) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Results section, “Phages displaying antigen sequences can overcome immune tolerance” (page unavailable), reports that antigen-displaying phages prolonged tumor latency and reduced tumor size and number in D16HER2 mice. The paper does not show a survival benefit or test its phage vaccines in multiple mouse models; its Discussion (page unavailable) describes the phages as self-adjuvating, not as delivering immunostimulatory cargo. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Together, these studies identify well-defined candidates for first-in-human evaluation.

    “Together, these studies identify well-defined candidates for first-in-human evaluation while underscoring the need to address translational barriers related to scalability, regulatory approval, and patient stratification.”

    From Phage therapy in oncology: opportunities for cancer prevention and treatment (2026) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies specific anti-HER2 phage vaccines and says the findings support their use in the clinical management of HER2-positive breast cancer. The evidence is from mice, however, and the paper does not identify the vaccines as ready or well-defined candidates for first-in-human evaluation. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: C. Bartolacci, C. Andreani, S. Occhipinti, L. Massaccesi, M. Giovarelli, R. Galeazzi, J. Wang, C. Marchini, A. Amici Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): C. Bartolacci Study supervision: C. Marchini, A. Amici References 1. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastie T, Marron JS, Nobel A, et al. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003;100:8418-23.
  2. Yamauchi H, Stearns V, Hayes DF. The role of c-erbB-2 as a predictive factor in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2001;8:171-83.
  3. Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62:220-41.
  4. Mendes D, Alves C, Afonso N, Cardoso F, Passos-Coelho JL, Costa L, et al. The benefit of HER2-targeted therapies on overall survival of patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer-a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res 2015;17:140.
  5. Rexer BN, Arteaga CL. Intrinsic and acquired resistance to HER2-targeted therapies in HER2 gene-amplified breast cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications. Crit Rev Oncog 2012;17:1-16.
  6. Finn OJ. The dawn of vaccines for cancer prevention. Nat Rev Immunol 2018;18:183-94.
  7. Mittendorf EA, Peoples GE. Injecting hope-a review of breast cancer vaccines. Oncology 2016;30:475-81, 85.
  8. Moasser MM. The oncogene HER2: its signaling and transforming functions and its role in human cancer pathogenesis. Oncogene 2007; 26:6469-87.
  9. Castiglioni F, Tagliabue E, Campiglio M, Pupa SM, Balsari A, Menard S. Role of exon-16-deleted HER2 in breast carcinomas. Endocr Relat Cancer 2006;13:221-32.
  10. Mitra D, Brumlik MJ, Okamgba SU, Zhu Y, Duplessis TT, Parvani JG, et al. An oncogenic isoform of HER2 associated with locally dissemi- nated breast cancer and trastuzumab resistance. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8:2152-62.
  11. Alajati A, Sausgruber N, Aceto N, Duss S, Sarret S, Voshol H, et al. Mammary tumor formation and metastasis evoked by a HER2 splice variant. Cancer Res 2013;73:5320-7.
  12. Ursini-Siegel J, Schade B, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ. Insights from transgenic mouse models of ERBB2-induced breast cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2007;7:389-97.
  13. Siegel PM, Ryan ED, Cardiff RD, Muller WJ. Elevated expression of activated forms of Neu/ErbB-2 and ErbB-3 are involved in the induction of mam- mary tumors in transgenic mice: implications for human breast cancer. EMBO J 1999;18:2149-64.
  14. Kwong KY, Hung MC. A novel splice variant of HER2 with increased transformation activity. Mol Carcinog 1998;23:62-8.
  15. Huynh FC, Jones FE. MicroRNA-7 inhibits multiple oncogenic pathways to suppress HER2Delta16 mediated breast tumorigenesis and reverse trastu- zumab resistance. PLoS One 2014;9:e114419.
  16. Tilio M, Gambini V, Wang J, Garulli C, Kalogris C, Andreani C, et al. Irreversible inhibition of Delta16HER2 is necessary to suppress Delta16- HER2-positive breast carcinomas resistant to lapatinib. Cancer Lett 2016;381:76-84.
  17. Gabrielli F, Salvi R, Garulli C, Kalogris C, Arima S, Tardella L, et al. Identification of relevant conformational epitopes on the HER2 oncopro- tein by using Large Fragment Phage Display (LFPD). PLoS One 2013;8: e58358.
  18. Marchini C, Gabrielli F, Iezzi M, Zenobi S, Montani M, Pietrella L, et al. The human splice variant Delta16HER2 induces rapid tumor onset in a reporter transgenic mouse. PLoS One 2011;6:e18727.
  19. Andreani C, Bartolacci C, Wijnant K, Crinelli R, Bianchi M, Magnani M, et al. Resveratrol fuels HER2 and ERalpha-positive breast cancer behaving as proteasome inhibitor. Aging 2017;9:508-23.
  20. Bostrom J, Yu SF, Kan D, Appleton BA, Lee CV, Billeci K, et al. Variants of the antibody herceptin that interact with HER2 and VEGF at the antigen binding site. Science 2009;323:1610-4.
  21. Fisher RD, Ultsch M, Lingel A, Schaefer G, Shao L, Birtalan S, et al. Structure of the complex between HER2 and an antibody paratope formed by side chains from tryptophan and serine. J Mol Biol 2010;402:217-29.
  22. Bocharov EV, Mineev KS, Volynsky PE, Ermolyuk YS, Tkach EN, Sobol AG, et al. Spatial structure of the dimeric transmembrane domain of the growth factor receptor ErbB2 presumably corresponding to the receptor active state. J Biol Chem 2008;283:6950-6.
  23. Red Brewer M, Choi SH, Alvarado D, Moravcevic K, Pozzi A, Lemmon MA, et al. The juxtamembrane region of the EGF receptor functions as an activation domain. Mol Cell 2009;34:641-51.
  24. Aertgeerts K, Skene R, Yano J, Sang BC, Zou H, Snell G, et al. Structural analysis of the mechanism of inhibition and allosteric activation of the kinase domain of HER2 protein. J Biol Chem 2011;286:18756-65.
  25. Uchida Y, Hara M, Nishio H, Sidransky E, Inoue S, Otsuka F, et al. Epidermal sphingomyelins are precursors for selected stratum corneum ceramides. J Lipid Res 2000;41:2071-82.
  26. Galeazzi R, Massaccesi L, Piva F, Principato G, Laudadio E. Insights into the influence of 5-HT2c aminoacidic variants with the inhibitory action of serotonin inverse agonists and antagonists. J Mol Model 2014; 20:2120.
  27. Fiser A, Sali A. ModLoop: automated modeling of loops in protein structures. Bioinformatics 2003;19:2500-1.
  28. Ko J, Park H, Heo L, Seok C. GalaxyWEB server for protein structure prediction and refinement. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40: W294-7.
  29. Ceroni A, Passerini A, Vullo A, Frasconi P. DISULFIND: a disulfide bonding state and cysteine connectivity prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:W177-81.
  30. Jo S, Kim T, Iyer VG, Im W. CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J Comput Chem 2008;29:1859-65.
  31. Disis ML, Shiota FM, Cheever MA. Human HER-2/neu protein immuni- zation circumvents tolerance to rat neu: a vaccine strategy for 'self' tumour antigens. Immunology 1998;93:192-9.
  32. Quaglino E, Mastini C, Amici A, Marchini C, Iezzi M, Lanzardo S, et al. A better immune reaction to Erbb-2 tumors is elicited in mice by DNA vaccines encoding rat/human chimeric proteins. Cancer Res 2010;70: 2604-12.
  33. Reverberi R, Reverberi L. Factors affecting the antigen-antibody reaction. Blood Transfus 2007;5:227-40.
  34. Watson JD. Molecular biology of the gene. San Francisco: Pearson/ Benjamin Cummings; 2003.
  35. Rolla S, Marchini C, Malinarich S, Quaglino E, Lanzardo S, Montani M, et al. Protective immunity against neu-positive carcinomas elicited by electroporation of plasmids encoding decreasing fragments of rat neu extracellular domain. Hum Gene Ther 2008;19:229-40.
  36. Betts MR, Brenchley JM, Price DA, De Rosa SC, Douek DC, Roederer M, et al. Sensitive and viable identification of antigen-specific CD8þ T cells by a flow cytometric assay for degranulation. J Immunol Methods 2003;281: 65-78.
  37. Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science 2003;299:1057-61.
  38. Allard D, Allard B, Gaudreau PO, Chrobak P, Stagg J. CD73-adenosine: a next-generation target in immuno-oncology. Immunotherapy 2016;8: 145-63.
  39. Wu Y, Wan Y, Bian J, Zhao J, Jia Z, Zhou L, et al. Phage display particles expressing tumor-specific antigens induce preventive and therapeutic anti-tumor immunity in murine p815 model. Int J Cancer 2002;98: 748-53.
  40. Fang J, Wang G, Yang Q, Song J, Wang Y, Wang L. The potential of phage display virions expressing malignant tumor specific antigen MAGE-A1 epitope in murine model. Vaccine 2005;23:4860-6.
  41. Hodyra-Stefaniak K, Miernikiewicz P, Drapala J, Drab M, Jonczyk-Matysiak E, Lecion D, et al. Mammalian Host-Versus-Phage immune response determines phage fate in vivo. Sci Rep 2015;5:14802.
  42. Liu MA, Ulmer JB. Human clinical trials of plasmid DNA vaccines. Adv Genet 2005;55:25-40.
  43. Marchini C, Kalogris C, Garulli C, Pietrella L, Gabrielli F, Curcio C, et al. Tailoring DNA vaccines: designing strategies against HER2-positive can- cers. Front Oncol 2013;3:122.
  44. Lollini PL, Forni G. Cancer immunoprevention: tracking down persistent tumor antigens. Trends Immunol 2003;24:62-6.
  45. Occhipinti S, Sponton L, Rolla S, Caorsi C, Novarino A, Donadio M, et al. Chimeric rat/human HER2 efficiently circumvents HER2 tolerance in cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2014;20:2910-21.
  46. Quaglino E, Mastini C, Forni G, Cavallo F. ErbB2 transgenic mice: a tool for investigation of the immune prevention and treatment of mammary carcinomas. Curr Protoc Immunol 2008;Chapter 20:Unit 20.9.1-20.9-10.
  47. Chen Y, Hu D, Eling DJ, Robbins J, Kipps TJ. DNA vaccines encoding full-length or truncated Neu induce protective immunity against Neu- expressing mammary tumors. Cancer Res 1998;58:1965-71.
  48. Quaglino E, Iezzi M, Mastini C, Amici A, Pericle F, Di Carlo E, et al. Electroporated DNA vaccine clears away multifocal mammary carcinomas in her-2/neu transgenic mice. Cancer Res 2004;64:2858-64.
  49. Cho HS, Mason K, Ramyar KX, Stanley AM, Gabelli SB, Denney DW Jr, et al. Structure of the extracellular region of HER2 alone and in complex with the Herceptin Fab. Nature 2003;421:756-60.
  50. Reilly RT, Gottlieb MB, Ercolini AM, Machiels JP, Kane CE, Okoye FI, et al. HER-2/neu is a tumor rejection target in tolerized HER-2/neu transgenic mice. Cancer Res 2000;60:3569-76.
  51. Anderson MS, Venanzi ES, Klein L, Chen Z, Berzins SP, Turley SJ, et al. Projection of an immunological self shadow within the thymus by the aire protein. Science 2002;298:1395-401.
  52. Jin D, Fan J, Wang L, Thompson LF, Liu A, Daniel BJ, et al. CD73 on tumor cells impairs antitumor T-cell responses: a novel mechanism of tumor- induced immune suppression. Cancer Res 2010;70:2245-55.
  53. Meynell GG, Lawn AM. Filamentous Phages specific for the I Sex Factor. Nature 1968;217:1184-6.
  54. Gao J, Wang Y, Liu Z, Wang Z. Phage display and its application in vaccine design. Ann Microbiol 2010;60:13-9.
  55. Sartorius R, Pisu P, D'Apice L, Pizzella L, Romano C, Cortese G, et al. The use of filamentous bacteriophage fd to deliver MAGE-A10 or MAGE-A3 HLA-A2-restricted peptides and to induce strong antitumor CTL responses. J Immunol 2008;180:3719-28.
  56. Grabowska AM, Jennings R, Laing P, Darsley M, Jameson CL, Swift L, et al. Immunisation with phage displaying peptides representing single epitopes of the glycoprotein G can give rise to partial protective immunity to HSV-2. Virology 2000;269:47-53.
  57. Roehnisch T, Then C, Nagel W, Blumenthal C, Braciak T, Donzeau M, et al. Phage idiotype vaccination: first phase I/II clinical trial in patients with multiple myeloma. J Transl Med 2014;12:119.
  58. Jacob JB, Quaglino E, Radkevich-Brown O, Jones RF, Piechocki MP, Reyes JD, et al. Combining human and rat sequences in her-2 DNA vaccines blunts immune tolerance and drives antitumor immunity. Cancer Res 2010;70:119-28.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartolacci, C., Andreani, C., Curcio, C., Occhipinti, S., Massaccesi, L., Giovarelli, M., Galeazzi, R., Iezzi, M., Tilio, M., Gambini, V., Wang, J., Marchini, C., & Amici, A.
Affiliations
  • Università di Camerino (IT)
  • University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Marche Polytechnic University (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Bartolacci, Caterina
  • Amici, Augusto
Venue
Cancer Immunology Research
Published
2018-12-01
Volume
6
Issue
12
Pages
1486-1498
ISSN
  • 2326-6066 (ISSN-L)
  • 2326-6074
OpenAlex
W2897532536
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Immunology Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • Unicam Scientific Publications (University of Camerino) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) (IG-11889, IG-9366)
  • Fondazione Umberto Veronesi (Umberto Veronesi Foundation) (Fellowship)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
Keywords
HER2-positive breast cancer, phage display, DNA vaccine, immune tolerance, self-tolerance, humoral immune response, transgenic mice, cancer immunotherapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Epitopes, Breast Neoplasms, Dendritic Cells, Exons, Female, Humans, Immune Tolerance, Mice, Inbred Strains, Mice, Transgenic, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Bacteriophage M13, Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases, Vaccines, DNA, Cancer Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review