DeePathNet: A Transformer-Based Deep Learning Model Integrating Multiomic Data with Cancer Pathways
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Multiomic data analysis incorporating machine learning has the potential to significantly improve cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Traditional machine learning methods are usually limited to omic measurements, omitting existing domain knowledge, such as the biological networks that link molecular entities in various omic data types. Here, we develop a transformer-based explainable deep learning model, DeePathNet, which integrates cancer-specific pathway information into multiomic data analysis. Using a variety of big datasets, including ProCan-DepMapSanger, Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, and The Cancer Genome Atlas, we demonstrate and validate that DeePathNet outperforms traditional methods for predicting drug response and classifying cancer type and subtype. Combining biomedical knowledge and state-of-the-art deep learning methods, DeePathNet enables biomarker discovery at the pathway level, maximizing the power of data-driven approaches to cancer research. DeePathNet is available on GitHub at https://github.com/CMRI-ProCan/DeePathNet. Significance: DeePathNet integrates cancer-specific biological pathways using transformer-based deep learning for enhanced cancer analysis. It outperforms existing models in predicting drug responses, cancer types, and subtypes. By enabling pathway-level biomarker discovery, DeePathNet represents a significant advancement in cancer research and could lead to more effective treatments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 69 · Cited by 36
- Authors
- Cai, Z., Poulos, R. C., Aref, A., Robinson, P. J., Reddel, R. R., & Zhong, Q.
- Affiliations
- Children's Medical Research Institute (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Zhong, Qing
- Venue
- Cancer Research Communications
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3151-3164
- ISSN
- 2767-9764 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11652962
- OpenAlex
- W4404270506
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cancer Research Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Children's Medical Research
- David and Elaine Potter Foundation
- European Commission (H2020 SC1, HORIZON2020, H2020, 826121)
- Australian Cancer Research Foundation (2017/TPG001, REG171150)
- National Breast Cancer Foundation (IIRS-18-164)
- Cancer Institute NSW (2021/ CBG0002, REG171150), (2017/TPG001)
- University of Sydney
- NSW Ministry of Health (CMP-01)
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (H2020- SC1-DTH-2018-1, H2020-SC1, 826121)
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1138536, 2000855, H2020-SC1-DTH-2018-1, 1170739, 826121)
- Cancer Council NSW (IG 18‐01)
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- multiomic data integration, cancer pathways, transformer-based deep learning, explainable deep learning, drug response prediction, cancer subtyping, biological networks, cancer genomics, Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, TCGA
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Humans, Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review