The DOI matches its Crossref record.
EPIC-Germany – A Source for Studies into Diet and Risk of Chronic Diseases
Abstract
The ‘European Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)’ represents one of the main scientific activities of the EU program ‘Europe against Cancer’ and is a large-scale cohort study on diet and chronic diseases, especially cancer, with approximately 475,000 study participants. The German contribution amounted to 53,000 study participants recruited between 1994 and 1998. The study instruments of the baseline examination included self-administered questionnaires for optical reading, PC-guided interviews, and physical examinations. These instruments covered different aspects of lifestyle, with a particular focus on diet. In addition, about 95% of the participants provided 30 ml of blood. The blood was stored in liquid nitrogen for further use, preferentially in nested case-control studies. All interviews and examinations were conducted by trained interviewers in examination centers established for this study in local health offices. Every 2 years, a follow-up questionnaire is mailed to the study participants. The follow-up questionnaires will be used as the major source of outcome information and to update exposure information. The self-reported diseases are verified by medical data. In the future, record linkage with local cancer registries will help to support the identification and collection of incident cancer cases. Only an outline of hypotheses was formulated at the very beginning of EPIC in 1992. In the future, each etiological study will be based on detailed research hypotheses according to the existing knowledge and identified research gaps. These studies will be conducted on cancer at the international level and on non-cancer diseases at the national or local level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Riboli, E., Hunt, K., Slimani, N., Ferrari, P., Norat, T., Fahey, M., Charrondière, U., Hémon, B., Casagrande, C., Vignat, J., et al. (2002) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2002394 · Cited by 1,866
Self-citationPatterson, R., McNamara, E., Tainio, M., de Sá, T. H., Smith, A. D., Sharp, S. J., Edwards, P., Woodcock, J., Brage, S., & Wijndaele, K. (2018) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1 · Cited by 1,423
Floegel, A., Stefan, N., Yu, Z., Mühlenbruch, K., Drogan, D., Joost, H.-G., Fritsche, A., Häring, H.-U., Hrabě de Angelis, M., Peters, A., et al. (2013) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db12-0495 · Cited by 988
Self-citationNovel biomarkers for pre-diabetes identified by metabolomics
Wang‐Sattler, R., Yu, Z., Herder, C., Messias, A. C., Floegel, A., He, Y., Heim, K., Campillos, M., Holzapfel, C., Thorand, B., et al. (2012) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.1038/msb.2012.43 · Cited by 701
Self-citationFiber and Magnesium Intake and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Study and Meta-analysis
Schulze, M. B. (2007) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.167.9.956 · Cited by 537
Metadata
- Authors
- Boeing, H., Wahrendorf, J., & Becker, N.
- Venue
- Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 195-204
- ISSN
- 0250-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9697
- OpenAlex
- W1993229845
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EPIC-Germany – A Source for Studies into Diet and Risk of Chronic Diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000012786
- The paper
- Boeing, H., Wahrendorf, J., & Becker, N. (1999). EPIC-Germany – A Source for Studies into Diet and Risk of Chronic Diseases. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1159/000012786
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.