The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recruitment Procedures of EPIC-Germany
Abstract
EPIC is among the largest cohort studies, with approximately 475,000 study participants, on the etiological influence of diet and chronic diseases. During a 4-year recruitment period, two German EPIC centers, located in Heidelberg and Potsdam, aimed to recruit a total of 60,000 study participants from the local populations. The recruitment process was based on addresses from general population registries and started 4–5 weeks in advance with an initial invitation by mail to the basic examination for this study. Subjects not responding within 2 weeks were reminded. In Potsdam, this was done by mail and telephone, and in Heidelberg by telephone. During the recruitment phase, from 1994 to 1998, 53,162 subjects in total were examined for the cohort studies in Heidelberg (n = 25,546) and Potsdam (n = 27,616). The participation rate, compared to the invited number of subjects, was 22.7% in Potsdam and 38.3% in Heidelberg, with a considerable variation by municipality and gender. A comparison with data from the National Health Survey 1991/1992 revealed that the cohort populations were of higher socio-economic status and were healthier than the source population. We concluded that the selective participation would help to ensure high maintenance of the cohort during active follow-up. Selective participation does not harm etiological conclusions because disease associations are derived internally as relative risk. The relative risk estimates can be used to calculate population-attributable risk and preventable proportion, based on exposure prevalence derived by surveys and other studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Riboli, E., Hunt, K., Slimani, N., Ferrari, P., Norat, T., Fahey, M., Charrondière, U., Hémon, B., Casagrande, C., Vignat, J., et al. (2002) · Public Health Nutrition · doi:10.1079/phn2002394 · Cited by 1,866
Self-citationInflammatory Cytokines and the Risk to Develop Type 2 Diabetes
Spranger, J., Kroke, A., Möhlig, M., Hoffmann, K., Bergmann, M. M., Ristow, M., Boeing, H., & Pfeiffer, A. F. H. (2003) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.52.3.812 · Cited by 1,493
Self-citationFloegel, A., Stefan, N., Yu, Z., Mühlenbruch, K., Drogan, D., Joost, H.-G., Fritsche, A., Häring, H.-U., Hrabě de Angelis, M., Peters, A., et al. (2013) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/db12-0495 · Cited by 988
Self-citationFiber and Magnesium Intake and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes: A Prospective Study and Meta-analysis
Schulze, M. B. (2007) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.167.9.956 · Cited by 537
Survey non-response in the Netherlands: Effects on prevalence estimates and associations
Van Loon, A. (2003) · Annals of Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s1047-2797(02)00257-0 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Boeing, H., Korfmann, A., & Bergmann, M. M.
- Venue
- Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 205-215
- ISSN
- 0250-6807 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9697
- OpenAlex
- W1992026895
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recruitment Procedures of EPIC-Germany. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000012787
- The paper
- Boeing, H., Korfmann, A., & Bergmann, M. M. (1999). Recruitment Procedures of EPIC-Germany. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1159/000012787
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.