Predictors of the development of hyperkalemia in patients using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
Abstract
Background/aims Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) are the antihypertensives of choice in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF). ACEI by decreasing the synthesis of aldosterone, the main regulator of serum potassium, predispose to the development of hyperkalemia. Although hyperkalemia with administration of ACEI is uncommon in patients with a normal renal function, a preexisting abnormality in potassium hemostasis, as seen in patients with chronic renal failure, may increase the risk of hyperkalemia. Method To determine the predictors of development of hyperkalemia (K >5.1 mEq/l) in patients on ACEI, we retrospectively reviewed medical records of 119 patients followed in our renal clinic. Results The mean age of the patients was 56 +/- (SD) 13 (range 20-84) years. Sixty-three percent were males, and 37% were females. Sixty-seven percent had a history of diabetes. Eighty five percent of the patients had CRF [creatinine clearance (CrCl) Conclusions We conclude that hyperkalemia is common in patients with CRF on ACEI. The majority of the patients who develop hyperkalemia on ACEI have CRF and diabetes. A large number of patients with CRF require discontinuation of ACEI due to hyperkalemia and are deprived of their renoprotective effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hyperkalemia is a known complication with RAS blockade and occurs in up to 10% of outpatients and up to 38% of hospitalized patients receiving an ACEi.
“Hyperkalemia is a known complication with RAS blockade and occurs in up to 10% of outpatients 69 and up to 38% of hospitalized patients 70 receiving an ACEi.”
From KDIGO 2022 Clinical Practice Guideline for Diabetes Management in Chronic Kidney Disease (2022) · cites this paper as [70]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 114
- Authors
- Ahuja, T. S., Freeman Jr., D., Mahnken, J. D., Agraharkar, M., Siddiqui, M., & Memon, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
- Venue
- American Journal of Nephrology
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 268-272
- ISSN
- 0250-8095 (ISSN-L)
- 1421-9670
- OpenAlex
- W1991106789
- Cited by
- 114
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Nephrology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Potassium and Related Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
- Keywords
- hyperkalemia, ACE inhibitors, chronic kidney disease, potassium homeostasis, aldosterone, diabetes mellitus, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, bicarbonate, risk factors, low potassium diet, antihypertensive therapy, adverse drug reactions, potassium supplementation, hemodialysis, hemofiltration, hemodiafiltration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Benzazepines, Diet, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Hyperkalemia, Male, Middle Aged, Potassium, Retrospective Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review