Sexual Dimorphism in the Rabbit Masseter Muscle: Myosin Heavy Chain Composition of Neuromuscular Compartments
Abstract
The myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoform composition of six adult (>7 months old) male and female rabbit masseter muscles was studied using seven monoclonal antibodies. In matched serial tissue sections, muscle fibers in 10 different neuromuscular compartments were analyzed. Nearly all fibers were found to express one of five phenotypes. They either contained one of four different slow/beta MyHC phenotypes (I 1–I 4), nearly all of which co-express cardiac alpha MyHC, or they contained type IIa MyHC. Very few fibers contained slow/beta or cardiac alpha MyHC only or both the alpha/slow/beta and IIa isoforms. Most, but not all, of the compartments studied contained similar proportions of fibers of the five major phenotypes, at least within sex. For 7 of the 10 compartments studied, significant sex differences in the proportion of I 1 and IIa fibers were found. Males contained more IIa fibers and fewer I 1 fibers than females. Fibers of the IIa phenotype were significantly larger than fibers of all of the other phenotypes and larger in males than females.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Male rabbit masseter is comprised of nearly 80% type-IIA fibers, whereas the female masseter contains only ∼50%.
“Male rabbit masseter is comprised of nearly 80% type-IIA fibers, whereas the female masseter contains only ∼50% (28).”
From Sex-Based Differences in Skeletal Muscle Kinetics and Fiber-Type Composition (2015) · cites this paper as [28]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 71
- Authors
- English, A. W., Eason, J., Schwartz, G., Shirley, A., & Carrasco, D. I.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- ORCID
- English, Arthur W.
- Venue
- Cells Tissues Organs
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 179-191
- ISSN
- 1422-6405 (ISSN-L)
- 1422-6421
- OpenAlex
- W2069076848
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cells Tissues Organs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01de011536-07)
- U.S. Public Health Service
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE11536)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Keywords
- sexual dimorphism, masseter muscle, myosin heavy chain isoforms, neuromuscular compartments, muscle fiber phenotype, type IIA fibers, fiber diameter, rabbits
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Female, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Masseter Muscle, Phenotype, Rabbits, Sex Characteristics, Species Specificity, Immunoblotting, Muscle Fibers, Skeletal, Myosin Heavy Chains, Protein Isoforms, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review